From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@attbi.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: st_dev:st_ino
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:02:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87llontap1.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040105014755.GB24410@mark.mielke.cc> (Mark Mielke's message of "Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:47:55 -0500")
Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 08:43:27PM -0500, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>> Unfortunately, programs such as tar depend on inode numbers of distinct
>> files being distinct even when the file is not open over a period of
>> several minutes/seconds. This is needed to avoid dumping hard links
>> more than once. Furthermore, there is no efficient way to write
>> programs such as tar without depending on this capability. Thus, if
>> st_ino cannot be used reliably for this purpose, it would be useful for
>> there to be a system call for retrieving a true
>> unique-within-the-filesystem identifier for the file.
> We already have that: st_nlink
> I think you mean a system call that would allow you to be certain that
> two file descriptors refer to the same file. Then, any files with
> st_nlink >= 2 would have to use the system call to match them up.
In order to efficiently implement tar, it is necessary to store the
inode numbers for files with a link count greater than 1 in a hash
table. It would not be practical to keep open all of these files in
order to ensure that the inode numbers remain valid. Thus, a different
unique identifier is needed, which is unique even for files that are not
open.
--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-05 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <18Cz7-7Ep-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-12-31 3:05 ` udev and devfs - The final word Pascal Schmidt
2003-12-31 19:23 ` Greg KH
2003-12-31 20:19 ` Rob Love
2003-12-31 22:01 ` Nathan Conrad
2003-12-31 22:20 ` Rob Love
2003-12-31 21:45 ` Tommi Virtanen
2003-12-31 23:10 ` Rob Love
2003-12-31 21:52 ` Tommi Virtanen
2004-01-02 0:17 ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-01-02 0:36 ` viro
2004-01-03 6:04 ` Greg KH
2003-12-31 22:55 ` viro
2003-12-31 23:05 ` Rob Love
2003-12-31 23:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-01-07 10:15 ` Olaf Hering
2004-01-07 11:18 ` viro
2004-01-07 13:00 ` Olaf Hering
2004-01-07 13:26 ` viro
2004-01-07 13:27 ` Olaf Hering
2004-01-01 0:15 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-01 0:31 ` Rob Love
2004-01-01 12:34 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-01 15:22 ` Rob Love
2004-01-01 15:48 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-01 15:54 ` Rob Love
2004-01-02 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-03 3:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-03 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-03 13:10 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-03 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-03 23:08 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-04 1:16 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-04 1:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-04 18:44 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-04 2:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-04 2:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-04 3:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-04 4:36 ` Pentium 4 HT SMP Ananda Bhattacharya
2004-01-04 5:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-01-04 13:21 ` udev and devfs - The final word Andries Brouwer
2004-01-04 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-04 22:01 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-04 22:37 ` viro
2004-01-05 1:02 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-05 2:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-05 2:29 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-05 3:42 ` viro
2004-01-04 22:37 ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-04 23:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-05 1:43 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-01-05 1:47 ` st_dev:st_ino (was: Re: udev and devfs - The final word) Mark Mielke
2004-01-05 2:02 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard [this message]
2004-01-05 3:14 ` st_dev:st_ino viro
2004-01-05 1:58 ` udev and devfs - The final word viro
2004-01-05 2:12 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-01-05 2:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 3:06 ` David Lang
2004-01-05 3:48 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-05 4:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-05 7:03 ` [offtopic] " Rob Landley
2004-01-05 12:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-05 15:13 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-05 16:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-01-05 22:18 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-05 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-05 3:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 3:50 ` viro
2004-01-05 4:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 4:38 ` viro
2004-01-05 4:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 6:11 ` viro
2004-01-05 7:47 ` Greg KH
2004-01-05 11:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-05 20:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-05 21:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-05 22:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-06 0:14 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-06 17:28 ` [OT] " Disconnect
2004-01-11 22:12 ` Ed L Cashin
2004-01-05 5:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-05 7:39 ` Greg KH
2004-01-07 9:57 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-05 12:27 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-05 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 17:29 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-05 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 17:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-05 18:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 18:09 ` Hugo Mills
2004-01-05 19:10 ` Paul Rolland
2004-01-05 19:52 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-05 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 22:17 ` Shawn
2004-01-05 22:25 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-05 23:05 ` Shawn
2004-01-05 23:23 ` Shawn
2004-01-06 0:43 ` Greg KH
2004-01-06 0:53 ` Shawn
2004-01-05 23:13 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-05 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 0:59 ` viro
2004-01-06 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 4:28 ` viro
2004-01-06 5:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 1:06 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-06 15:00 ` Mark Mielke
2004-01-06 0:00 ` Greg KH
2004-01-06 1:41 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-07 17:14 ` Greg KH
2004-01-06 0:31 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-06 7:14 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-06 0:36 ` Silly udev script [was Re: udev and devfs - The final word] Greg KH
2004-01-05 7:44 ` udev and devfs - The final word James H. Cloos Jr.
2004-01-05 7:45 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-05 11:01 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-01-05 12:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-05 14:31 ` IRQ disabled on linux 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 Mainak Mandal _00007001_
2004-01-07 13:39 ` udev and devfs - The final word Robin Rosenberg
2004-01-07 17:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-05 9:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-05 4:15 ` Peter Chubb
2004-01-05 4:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-03 18:34 ` Wrapping jiffies [was Re: udev and devfs - The final word] Pavel Machek
2004-01-01 19:43 ` udev and devfs - The final word Kai Henningsen
2004-01-02 7:26 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-04 8:57 ` Greg KH
2004-01-04 9:43 ` Rob Landley
2004-01-02 0:17 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
[not found] ` <20040102103104.GA28168@mark.mielke.cc>
2004-01-03 6:07 ` Greg KH
2004-01-03 6:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 11:57 ` Ian Kent
2004-01-03 22:08 ` Greg KH
2004-01-07 10:23 ` Olaf Hering
2004-01-01 23:14 ` Rob
2004-01-02 3:53 ` Tyler Hall
2004-01-01 16:17 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-01-01 20:03 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87llontap1.fsf@jbms.ath.cx \
--to=jbms@attbi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome