From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42186C433DF for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137721534 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729997AbgEVOEi (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 10:04:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729399AbgEVOEh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 10:04:37 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CAB5C061A0E; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8He-0005Uc-Qj; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:22 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C755100F17; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ard Biesheuvel , Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-efi , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arvind Sankar , Benjamin Thiel , Dave Young , Heinrich Schuchardt , Javier Martinez Canillas , Jerry Snitselaar , Lenny Szubowicz , ACPI Devel Maling List , Loic Yhuel , Matthew Garrett , Mike Lothian , Punit Agrawal Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/7] EFI fixes for v5.7 In-Reply-To: References: <20200517125754.8934-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20200522134004.GF28750@zn.tnic> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87mu60rrq2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ard, Ard Biesheuvel writes: > On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 15:40, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:06:20PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> > Ping? >> >> Did you want to make your tags unique from the next pull request onwards >> and I were supposed to pull this one as is? > > What usually happens is that Ingo applies the patches piecemeal, > ignoring the tag altogether, so without any coordination between you > as x86 maintainers or communication back to me, that is what i was > expecting to happen this time as well. > > Note that I have another PR pending since two weeks ago [0]. > > So if you want to start dealing with the EFI trees in a different way > from now on, that is perfectly fine with me, but please align with > Ingo and Thomas first. /me dons managerial hat Yes, please. Your pull request really do not need any special handling. Please add a unique signed tag to each pull request and stick the description, e.g. " EFI fixes for v5.7-rcX: - fix EFI framebuffer earlycon for wide fonts - avoid filling screen_info with garbage...." into the tag which gives us the merge commit message automagically. Thanks tglx