From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com, minkim@us.ibm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] of: phandle_cache, fix refcounts, remove stale entry
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:46:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mup2s8if.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKZ=g16jZ_SZX2qi-ecE-hvQ+-UfUw40=+ztiM-Zpsq9A@mail.gmail.com>
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:56 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in
>> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle()
>> will incorrectly find the stale entry. This bug exposed the foloowing
>> phandle cache refcount bug.
>>
>> The refcount of phandle_cache entries is not incremented while in
>> the cache, allowing use after free error after kfree() of the
>> cached entry.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - make __of_free_phandle_cache() static
>> - add WARN_ON(1) for unexpected condition in of_find_node_by_phandle()
>>
>> Frank Rowand (2):
>> of: of_node_get()/of_node_put() nodes held in phandle cache
>> of: __of_detach_node() - remove node from phandle cache
>
> I'll send this to Linus this week if I get a tested by. Otherwise, it
> will go in for 4.21.
I think it can wait to go into 4.21, it's not super critical and it's
not a regression since 4.19.
cheers
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 7:56 frowand.list
2018-12-17 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] of: of_node_get()/of_node_put() nodes held in phandle cache frowand.list
2018-12-17 10:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-17 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] of: __of_detach_node() - remove node from " frowand.list
2018-12-17 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-18 18:57 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-18 20:01 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-18 20:09 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-18 20:33 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-18 20:58 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-18 23:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-18 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] of: phandle_cache, fix refcounts, remove stale entry Rob Herring
2018-12-18 23:46 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mup2s8if.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=minkim@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®