From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] DM Regression in 4.16-rc1 - read() returns data when it shouldn't
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:52:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mv0aprd8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1df6de2e-bfd3-84c4-cffb-83b6299c6d23@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4249 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 15 2018, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 02/15/2018 01:07 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> And looking again at the code, it doesn't seem so bad. I was worried
>> about reassigning ci.io->orig_bio after calling
>> __split_and_process_non_flush(), but the important thing is to set it
>> before the last dec_pending() call, and the code gets that right.
>>
>> I think I've found the problem though:
>>
>> /* done with normal IO or empty flush */
>> bio->bi_status = io_error;
>>
>> When we have chained bios, there are multiple sources for error which
>> need to be merged into bi_status: all bios that were chained to this
>> one, and this bio itself.
>>
>> __bio_chain_endio uses:
>>
>> if (!parent->bi_status)
>> parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>>
>> so the new status won't over-ride the old status (unless there are
>> races....), but dm doesn't do that - I guess it didn't have to worry
>> about chains before.
>>
>> So this:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
>> index d6de00f367ef..68136806d365 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
>> @@ -903,7 +903,8 @@ static void dec_pending(struct dm_io *io, blk_status_t error)
>> queue_io(md, bio);
>> } else {
>> /* done with normal IO or empty flush */
>> - bio->bi_status = io_error;
>> + if (io_error)
>> + bio->bi_status = io_error;
>> bio_endio(bio);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> well, it indeed fixes the reported problem, thanks.
> But I just tested the first (dm.c) change above.
>
> The important part is also that if the error is hits bio later, it will produce
> short read (and not fail of the whole operation), this can be easily tested if we switch
> the error and the zero target in that reproducer
> //system("echo -e \'0 10000000 error\'\\\\n\'10000000 1000000 zero\' | dmsetup create test");
> system("echo -e \'0 10000000 zero\'\\\\n\'10000000 1000000 error\' | dmsetup create test");
>
> So it seems your patch works.
Excellent - thanks.
>
> I am not sure about this part though:
>
>> should fix it. And __bio_chain_endio should probably be
>>
>> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
>> index e1708db48258..ad77140edc6f 100644
>> --- a/block/bio.c
>> +++ b/block/bio.c
>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
>> {
>> struct bio *parent = bio->bi_private;
>>
>> - if (!parent->bi_status)
>> + if (bio->bi_status)
>> parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>
> Shouldn't it be
> if (!parent->bi_status && bio->bi_status)
> parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> ?
That wouldn't hurt, but I don't see how it would help.
It would still be racy as two chained bios could complete at
the same time, so ->bi_status much change between test and set.
>
> Maybe one rephrased question: what about priorities for errors (bio statuses)?
>
> For example, part of a bio fails with EILSEQ (data integrity check error, BLK_STS_PROTECTION),
> part with EIO (media error, BLK_STS_IOERR). What should be reported for parent bio?
> (I would expect I always get EIO here because this is hard, uncorrectable error.)
If there was a well defined ordering, then we could easily write to code
ensure the highest priority status wins, but I don't think there is any
such ordering.
Certainly dec_pending() in dm.c already faces the possibility that it will
be called multiple times with different errors, but doesn't consider any
ordering (except relating to BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE), when assigning a
status code to io->status.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the fix!
And thanks for the report.
NeilBrown
>
> Milan
>
>
>> bio_put(bio);
>> return parent;
>>
>> to remove the chance that a race will hide a real error.
>>
>> Milan: could you please check that the patch fixes the dm-crypt bug?
>> I've confirmed that it fixes your test case.
>> When you confirm, I'll send a proper patch.
>>
>> I guess I should audit all code that assigns to ->bi_status and make
>> sure nothing ever assigns 0 to it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> NeilBrown
>>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 13:02 Milan Broz
2018-02-14 20:39 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-14 23:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-02-15 0:07 ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-15 7:37 ` Milan Broz
2018-02-15 8:52 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-02-15 9:00 ` [PATCH] dm: correctly handle chained bios in dec_pending() NeilBrown
2018-02-15 9:01 ` [RFC PATCH] dm: don't assign zero to ->bi_status of an active bio NeilBrown
2018-02-15 9:09 ` [PATCH] block: be more careful about status in __bio_chain_endio NeilBrown
2019-02-22 21:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-22 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-22 23:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-23 2:02 ` John Dorminy
2019-02-23 2:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-23 3:10 ` John Dorminy
2019-06-12 2:56 ` John Dorminy
2019-06-12 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-19 13:44 ` DM Regression in 4.16-rc1 - read() returns data when it shouldn't Thorsten Leemhuis
2018-02-19 17:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-02-26 10:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2018-02-26 11:01 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-26 17:31 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mv0aprd8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome