mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] DM Regression in 4.16-rc1 - read() returns data when it shouldn't
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:52:03 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mv0aprd8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1df6de2e-bfd3-84c4-cffb-83b6299c6d23@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4249 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 15 2018, Milan Broz wrote:

> On 02/15/2018 01:07 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> 
>> And looking again at the code, it doesn't seem so bad.  I was worried
>> about reassigning ci.io->orig_bio after calling
>> __split_and_process_non_flush(), but the important thing is to set it
>> before the last dec_pending() call, and the code gets that right.
>> 
>> I think I've found the problem though:
>> 
>> 			/* done with normal IO or empty flush */
>> 			bio->bi_status = io_error;
>> 
>> When we have chained bios, there are multiple sources for error which
>> need to be merged into bi_status:  all bios that were chained to this
>> one, and this bio itself.
>> 
>> __bio_chain_endio uses:
>> 
>> 	if (!parent->bi_status)
>> 		parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>> 
>> so the new status won't over-ride the old status (unless there are
>> races....), but dm doesn't do that - I guess it didn't have to worry
>> about chains before.
>> 
>> So this:
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
>> index d6de00f367ef..68136806d365 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
>> @@ -903,7 +903,8 @@ static void dec_pending(struct dm_io *io, blk_status_t error)
>>  			queue_io(md, bio);
>>  		} else {
>>  			/* done with normal IO or empty flush */
>> -			bio->bi_status = io_error;
>> +			if (io_error)
>> +				bio->bi_status = io_error;
>>  			bio_endio(bio);
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> 
>
> Hi,
>
> well, it indeed fixes the reported problem, thanks.
> But I just tested the first (dm.c) change above.
>
> The important part is also that if the error is hits bio later, it will produce
> short read (and not fail of the whole operation), this can be easily tested if we switch
> the error and the zero target in that reproducer
>   //system("echo -e \'0 10000000 error\'\\\\n\'10000000 1000000 zero\' | dmsetup create test");
>   system("echo -e \'0 10000000 zero\'\\\\n\'10000000 1000000 error\' | dmsetup create test");
>
> So it seems your patch works.

Excellent - thanks.

>
> I am not sure about this part though:
>
>> should fix it.  And __bio_chain_endio should probably be
>> 
>> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
>> index e1708db48258..ad77140edc6f 100644
>> --- a/block/bio.c
>> +++ b/block/bio.c
>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
>>  {
>>  	struct bio *parent = bio->bi_private;
>>  
>> -	if (!parent->bi_status)
>> +	if (bio->bi_status)
>>  		parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>
> Shouldn't it be
> 	if (!parent->bi_status && bio->bi_status)
>   		parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> ?

That wouldn't hurt, but I don't see how it would help.
It would still be racy as two chained bios could complete at
the same time, so ->bi_status much change between test and set.

>
> Maybe one rephrased question: what about priorities for errors (bio statuses)?
>
> For example, part of a bio fails with EILSEQ (data integrity check error, BLK_STS_PROTECTION),
> part with EIO (media error, BLK_STS_IOERR). What should be reported for parent bio?
> (I would expect I always get EIO here because this is hard, uncorrectable error.)

If there was a well defined ordering, then we could easily write to code
ensure the highest priority status wins, but I don't think there is any
such ordering.
Certainly dec_pending() in dm.c already faces the possibility that it will
be called multiple times with different errors, but doesn't consider any
ordering (except relating to BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE), when assigning a
status code to io->status.

>
> Anyway, thanks for the fix!

And thanks for the report.

NeilBrown

>
> Milan
>
>
>>  	bio_put(bio);
>>  	return parent;
>> 
>> to remove the chance that a race will hide a real error.
>> 
>> Milan: could you please check that the patch fixes the dm-crypt bug?
>> I've confirmed that it fixes your test case.
>> When you confirm, I'll send a proper patch.
>> 
>> I guess I should audit all code that assigns to ->bi_status and make
>> sure nothing ever assigns 0 to it.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> NeilBrown
>> 
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 13:02 Milan Broz
2018-02-14 20:39 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-14 23:05   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-02-15  0:07     ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-15  7:37       ` Milan Broz
2018-02-15  8:52         ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-02-15  9:00 ` [PATCH] dm: correctly handle chained bios in dec_pending() NeilBrown
2018-02-15  9:01 ` [RFC PATCH] dm: don't assign zero to ->bi_status of an active bio NeilBrown
2018-02-15  9:09 ` [PATCH] block: be more careful about status in __bio_chain_endio NeilBrown
2019-02-22 21:10   ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-22 22:46     ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-22 23:55       ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-23  2:02         ` John Dorminy
2019-02-23  2:44           ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-23  3:10             ` John Dorminy
2019-06-12  2:56               ` John Dorminy
2019-06-12  7:01                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17  7:32                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-19 13:44 ` DM Regression in 4.16-rc1 - read() returns data when it shouldn't Thorsten Leemhuis
2018-02-19 17:15   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-02-26 10:14     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2018-02-26 11:01       ` NeilBrown
2018-02-26 17:31         ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mv0aprd8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome