mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ARM: bcm2835: Add a Raspberry Pi-specific clock driver.
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:09:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw0ncia2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55679085.6040402@wwwdotorg.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]

Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> writes:

> On 05/18/2015 01:43 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> +	init.flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
>
> Is it possible to add clock parent information to the driver, so the
> clocks are all hooked together into the correct tree, rather than all
> looking like root clocks?
>
> One of the many reasons I didn't do anything FW-wise for the kernel was
> the hope that such information would be forthcoming, and hence we could
> have complete kernel drivers.

As far as I can tell, none of these clocks are the parent of any other.

There's a layer of PLLs, then clockman almost always just dividing off
of those.  In response to a clockman request (which is what this
property tag quickly maps to), only PLLH ever gets changed as a result
of RPI_CLOCK_PIXEL.  PLLH feeds the HDMI and VEC (SDTV).  We don't have
an SDTV clock for us to control through these interfaces, so there are
no conflicts that I can see.  Only two clockman clocks I see divide off
of on other clockman clocks, and we don't have access to those.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-29 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-18 19:43 Raspberry Pi DT clocks series Eric Anholt
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt/bindings: Add binding for the Raspberry Pi clock provider Eric Anholt
2015-05-28 21:46   ` Stephen Warren
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: bcm2835: Add a Raspberry Pi-specific clock driver Eric Anholt
2015-05-19  3:05   ` Baruch Siach
2015-05-28 19:02     ` [PATCH 2/7 v2] " Eric Anholt
2015-05-28 22:02   ` [PATCH 2/7] " Stephen Warren
2015-05-28 22:48     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-29 19:30       ` Eric Anholt
2015-05-29 19:09     ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2015-05-29 21:02     ` Eric Anholt
2015-06-05  2:56       ` Stephen Warren
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: bcm2835: Add DT for the firmware clocks driver Eric Anholt
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: bcm2835: Drop never-used clock-frequency property of uart0 Eric Anholt
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: bcm2835: Drop the fixed sys_pclk Eric Anholt
2015-05-28 22:05   ` Stephen Warren
2015-05-29 17:44     ` Eric Anholt
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: bcm2835: Use the RPi firmware clocks for uart Eric Anholt
2015-05-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: bcm2835: Tie SPI clock to the core clock rate Eric Anholt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mw0ncia2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
    --to=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®