From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751252AbWFZR5x (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:57:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751251AbWFZR5x (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:57:53 -0400 Received: from 41-052.adsl.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.41.52]:55050 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236AbWFZR5w (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:57:52 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kai@germaschewski.name, Sam Ravnborg , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16 References: <87psh3mnay.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> From: Nix X-Emacs: (setq software-quality (/ 1 number-of-authors)) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:57:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87psh3mnay.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (nix@esperi.org.uk's message of "21 Jun 2006 00:15:48 +0100") Message-ID: <87mzbzhk9y.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21 Jun 2006, nix@esperi.org.uk stipulated: > It didn't take long to work out that this was because my initramfs's > contents were being included twice in the cpio image. Ping? Anyone? -- `NB: Anyone suggesting that we should say "Tibibytes" instead of Terabytes there will be hunted down and brutally slain. That is all.' --- Matthew Wilcox