From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3B7266181; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739464853; cv=none; b=qaGH3jN+kDdFi+up8NYi6sbx6G96nGb6TRImT7eAadpTMmoZn84MukSzVzyTnt1CjjlD4sbeqbpuUMmQQy56lgh2DvyF6cxbOntGS+/jIsV1qd8AU2aUEZz58PYD/3vraCeyMvRLEJFRMf+l6PSA/dweeMAoJTHcZIy0p5xHu8c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739464853; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+NmJvozCvHqYo27+QZ99g9mKJER+YVCPI759srgIddc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=deLiy6h3QeLd7SsEUAl5j0BdCn+RalHtUt+Wcclq8F2xJUAyfKX/kXTq3om/+6HbmZ6S06avP9/P+sUBHUtxB0c1LleTj7VnTI5DiGelEF5WbYnPKg9U4KWxFfLXu+mpumBYWzQvX6++pBGu3rRcQRgRbMMHQ6QohOXoQtm0Ek0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=mHu6CIWh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="mHu6CIWh" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net B85D444097 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1739464850; bh=0XfX4xkUPnhb3Qg4pir8Dg6wUP9Xma+uY4HBJFMOGuQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mHu6CIWhUFtFxJvqpyTvgeZSXxUegMO2ofWHiYbxqel+lpFK6TQEueZhCy9TX30ea DEO0CsXG3P3Su+N03pSD4LFjKPemVO4kRAMVrFzplcIpV/0FAbhBg+Hzk4mXpalnRL hKi7ZHERh1oZTIqHSeqyeK9ZgafTxadjJlxV2IC+34pmOjvMK/2cSJJCKKulrGyM9x KSdUt+MqViP2eIEhgl0wSBZaHVK7Lj07MnUlnKI3lxgEEPZ+np4G4JfyZKi6UEjkV2 vTybn1XeZJhnoEI0j7xA2vIs8qMB3IS4oSMjOT694n8dkFIpUc4oU4qOa3SML9Y+CA D7ESS8vnIYt9Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B85D444097; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:40:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Makefile: use the new script to check for bad ABI references In-Reply-To: <20250211054446.1696826-1-mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <20250211054446.1696826-1-mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:40:49 -0700 Message-ID: <87o6z56bn2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > The get_abi.pl script was replaced by get_abi.py. Update it at docs > makefile. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502110736.ZGWaWsep-lkp@intel.com/ > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > --- > Documentation/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile > index 52c6c5a3efa9..63094646df28 100644 > --- a/Documentation/Makefile > +++ b/Documentation/Makefile > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ endif > > # Check for broken ABI files > ifeq ($(CONFIG_WARN_ABI_ERRORS),y) > -$(shell $(srctree)/scripts/get_abi.pl validate --dir $(srctree)/Documentation/ABI) > +$(shell $(srctree)/scripts/get_abi.py --dir $(srctree)/Documentation/ABI validate) > endif Applied, thanks. jon