From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ns: Move MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL to ns_common.h, reuse it
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:29:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o81u88ju.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325112127.18026-1-pvorel@suse.cz> (Petr Vorel's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:21:27 +0100")
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> writes:
> Move MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL to ns_common.h and reuse it in check in
> user_namespace.c.
What is the motivation for this change?
Is it just that there is a bare number in create_user_ns and that is a
little ugly? Or is there something more motivating this?
Eric
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Hi Christian, all,
>
> I don't see putting MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL into ns_common.h as an elegant
> solution but IMHO better than use a hardwired number or redefinition in
> user_namespace.h.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> include/linux/ns_common.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 3 ---
> kernel/user_namespace.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ns_common.h b/include/linux/ns_common.h
> index 0f1d024bd958..173fab9dadf7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ns_common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ns_common.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
>
> #include <linux/refcount.h>
>
> +/* MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL is needed for limiting size of 'struct pid' */
> +#define MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL 32
> +
> struct proc_ns_operations;
>
> struct ns_common {
> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> index 07481bb87d4e..f814068012d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
> #include <linux/ns_common.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
>
> -/* MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL is needed for limiting size of 'struct pid' */
> -#define MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL 32
> -
> struct fs_pin;
>
> struct pid_namespace {
> diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> index 5481ba44a8d6..6ea6e263403d 100644
> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new)
> int ret, i;
>
> ret = -ENOSPC;
> - if (parent_ns->level > 32)
> + if (parent_ns->level > MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL)
> goto fail;
>
> ucounts = inc_user_namespaces(parent_ns, owner);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-25 11:21 Petr Vorel
2022-03-25 13:29 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2022-03-25 16:04 ` Petr Vorel
2022-03-25 15:37 ` Christian Brauner
2022-03-25 16:12 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o81u88ju.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®