From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6557C2B9F4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FCD60E08 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232157AbhFVPVm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:21:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57276 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231815AbhFVPVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:21:37 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C29C061574 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:19:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1624375160; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qe8XsamDYYUNw77+KfU2crpQsKFujdSuP/VjqH9RqeA=; b=SnR9zoWq/vIFw7+LtUutkp34o0vZnyCozQQxuPH08EqCNfF1hgU8AFvEjlB51e8Qvjq0KM Uo8T0A2SxvpkzuxMcK6nwy38FbSkBVI0sNdJ84/lLPTlGcrVImmWnoM2k5VXr3rN3UDHtr 0uzJSoRkt/mjIjjG1A4QGQhaCpTBkL79KMUddUu3G6kcWig4pOyOxwc/Mm7gSE0kxBPxEC yuAgcR3FM92jJOM9iAr+3bQqhMTjj52KrsVm9cz32HqGXGTpDg4OVINmaHaWY2xU6hXj2E XFBVyk7qG5ndYya1xlsXrELarWf6gUSlwdJGAcklguerDSJm3Y7w9zXsGY9Pog== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1624375160; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qe8XsamDYYUNw77+KfU2crpQsKFujdSuP/VjqH9RqeA=; b=2WYZsjPT0vOjljk4hbM27D9+AbcCNXZIiM1XCGQMjs2Wl/yXZXJ+zXhbDCmxz7rdgb7za4 aCuRJol/rLR61JDQ== To: Jisheng Zhang , John Stultz , Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer: Use static_branch_likely() for timers_nohz_active In-Reply-To: <20210513143354.096c6baf@xhacker.debian> References: <20210513143354.096c6baf@xhacker.debian> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:19:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8bydj0n.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13 2021 at 14:33, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > NOHZ is likely to be enabled, so use static_branch_likely() to Why is it likely to be enabled? Did you make a survey of the wider distro universe or what? > reflect this fact. This could improve the finally generated code could improve? Either it does or it does not. Thanks, tglx