From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7710BC43461 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390F561407 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237879AbhD1I5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:57:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44198 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237685AbhD1I5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:57:04 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE79C061574 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 01:56:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1619600176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Yw4zbZWnM1LPmPQXkz7A/is9cLSvX597px5tqOEQQo4=; b=AiEgCe9joO/m2F6pUIhcwtKgxeL/sY62GHtALfVn31G/PWeqRrxS+3kbIgeh7mAy1qwhE0 LW4qfv1WPj62xCG0mSctGzVAOE+elPvHxrm8NxIfsyP7evRb/g/K89Hd7vvPT8IASMUPRj 82d/EjeKuoEJ6t7NBLb0ylSmyphZiTFmYHXrhKrLw+UyF70+r0z18bEkZnQkxhEedBo76z mKkuKQQ04Jg++gUYb+ejlSVifsXePzOM7T04jsxuQwg4nLzRCP085AooHuUBDa0gcAIHRD T1A+nbQcShdIpKZHS+bQjJbjLarI2Yf+x1ww/zAbvA4GC24hSIt9uI3IV+RagQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1619600176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Yw4zbZWnM1LPmPQXkz7A/is9cLSvX597px5tqOEQQo4=; b=c3tXF+ERXAz6Zf+7+lv7on7FahKKJsDK7aaF8GJ+kqy6l8Xa6zaOnjWV/984sHRXG2hP+L OpZbepHN73Yu9tDw== To: Feng Tang , "Song Bao Hua \(Barry Song\)" Cc: kernel test robot , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "lkp\@lists.01.org" , "lkp\@intel.com" , "ying.huang\@intel.com" , "zhengjun.xing\@intel.com" , "x86\@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [genirq] cbe16f35be: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -5.2% regression In-Reply-To: <20210428080819.GB53821@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> References: <20210427090013.GG32408@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <87fszcnecr.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210428050758.GB52098@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20210428080819.GB53821@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:56:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8dyn5xr.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 28 2021 at 16:08, Feng Tang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 07:01:35AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > >> But it is still an irrelevant problem. > Yes, the commit itself has no problem. And my personal thought > is no further action is needed. The commit does not need any further action, but this testing stuff really needs further action because we can't differentiate between real regressions and these bogus reports anymore. Thanks, tglx