From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 2/2] signal: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8f9r7ug.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323180442.GC29219@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 23 2021 at 19:04, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/22, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +static void sigqueue_cache_or_free(struct sigqueue *q, bool cache)
>> + if (q) {
>> + tsk->sigqueue_cache = NULL;
>> + /* If task is self reaping, don't cache it back */
>> + sigqueue_cache_or_free(q, tsk != current);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Still not right or I am totally confused.
>
> tsk != current can be true if an exiting (and autoreaping) sub-thread
> releases its group leader.
>
> IOW. Suppose a process has 2 threads, its parent ignores SIGCHLD.
>
> The group leader L exits. Then its sub-thread T exits too and calls
> release_task(T). In this case the tsk != current is false.
>
> But after that T calls release_task(L) and L != T is true.
Bah. yes.
> I'd suggest to free tsk->sigqueue_cache in __exit_signal() unconditionally and
> remove the "bool cache" argument from sigqueue_cache_or_free().
That's what you get from trying to be clever, dammit.
Thanks for walking me through the oddities of exit !
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 9:19 [patch V4 0/2] signals: Allow caching one sigqueue object per task Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-22 9:19 ` [patch V4 1/2] signal: Hand SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC flag to __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-15 8:37 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-22 9:19 ` [patch V4 2/2] signal: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 18:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-23 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-03-23 21:05 ` [patch V5 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-24 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-04-15 8:37 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8f9r7ug.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome