From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA48C47255 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C18206E6 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731162AbgEKSmk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 14:42:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729768AbgEKSmj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 14:42:39 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6764C061A0C for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jYDNX-0003b7-E8; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:42:15 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E30B9FFBF8; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:42:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , LKML , X86 ML , "Paul E. McKenney" , Alexandre Chartre , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [patch V5 part 3 12/29] x86/entry/common: Provide idtentry_enter/exit() In-Reply-To: References: <20200505134354.774943181@linutronix.de> <20200505134904.457578656@linutronix.de> <874ksm7n5d.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8qu5n5l.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:59 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Andy Lutomirski writes: >> >> + * Invoked by all exception/interrupt IDTENTRY handlers which are not >> >> + * returning through the paranoid exit path (all except NMI, #DF and the IST >> >> + * variants of #MC and #DB). >> > > >> +void noinstr idtentry_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) >> +{ >> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); >> + >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY)) >> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack()); > > Whoops. After sleeping on this, this is obviously wrong. If this is > something like a page fault, we can be on an IST or IRQ stack. > Perhaps the actual condition should be: > > WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack() && (regs->flags & X86_FLAGS_IF) && > preempt_count() == 0); > > IOW, the actual condition we want is that, if the idtenter_entry/exit > code might schedule or if a cond_local_irq_enable() path might > schedule, we had better be on the correct stack. > > Sorry for causing confusion. Nothing to be sorry about. I could have thought about it myself :) Let me try again.