From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751305AbbCSVlq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:41:46 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:33695 "EHLO mail-la0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbbCSVlp (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:41:45 -0400 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Tejun Heo , Joe Perches , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] lib/vsprintf.c: Even faster decimal conversion Organization: D03 References: <87vbi96mcr.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <1426028472-19614-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150311145229.523118d7190cebece1304d2a@linux-foundation.org> X-Hashcash: 1:20:150319:peterz@infradead.org::jdNyLqW1mlnBxLiC:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000SXq X-Hashcash: 1:20:150319:joe@perches.com::WdLYwzYsANt3fB20:001o/q X-Hashcash: 1:20:150319:akpm@linux-foundation.org::LdT4ZSxnNRFVqOk8:00000000000000000000000000000000000067Uh X-Hashcash: 1:20:150319:tj@kernel.org::KxdAi0rlstFuLDee:00007qQv X-Hashcash: 1:20:150319:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::bWT5G7XrnLwEVb5y:0000000000000000000000000000000007nJU Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:41:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150311145229.523118d7190cebece1304d2a@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:52:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87oanopsvf.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 11 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:01:11 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> Test and verification code on github >> . It would be nice if someone could >> verify the code on architectures other than x86 - in particular, I >> believe it _should_ work on big-endian, but I have no way of testing >> that. Benchmark numbers would be nice too, of course. > > That would be nice. > > It would be best to make this as easy as possible for people. Verification passed on both ppc64le and ppc64; the microbenchmark showed improvements in 13-43% range for ppc64le and 13-34% for ppc64. Thanks to Nishanth Aravamudan. Rasmus