From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751656AbaG1AfP (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:35:15 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo01.lge.com ([156.147.1.125]:43815 "EHLO lgeamrelo01.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbaG1AfL (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:35:11 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Namhyung Kim , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf tools: Add name field into perf_hpp_fmt References: <1406251138-6574-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1406251138-6574-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20140725111230.GA1214@krava.brq.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:35:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20140725111230.GA1214@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:12:30 +0200") Message-ID: <87oawaiamb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiri, On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:12:30 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:18:57AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > SNIP > >> } >> >> -#define __HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type, _str) \ >> +#define __HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type) \ >> static int hpp__width_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, \ >> struct perf_hpp *hpp __maybe_unused, \ >> struct perf_evsel *evsel) \ >> @@ -219,19 +219,19 @@ static int hpp__width_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, \ >> if (symbol_conf.event_group) \ >> len = max(len, evsel->nr_members * fmt->len); \ >> \ >> - if (len < (int)strlen(_str)) \ >> - len = strlen(_str); \ >> + if (len < (int)strlen(fmt->name)) \ >> + len = strlen(fmt->name); \ > > hum, so with the '_str' string argument missing we dont need this > function to be generated by macro, right? could be one single function > called hpp__width_entry or something like that You're right. Will change both! Thanks, Namhyung > >> \ >> return len; \ >> } >> >> -#define __HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str) \ >> +#define __HPP_HEADER_FN(_type) \ >> static int hpp__header_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, \ >> struct perf_hpp *hpp, \ >> struct perf_evsel *evsel) \ >> { \ >> int len = hpp__width_##_type(fmt, hpp, evsel); \ >> - return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", len, _str); \ >> + return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s", len, fmt->name); \ >> } >> > > same here ^^^ for hpp__header_##_type > > > jirka