From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932437AbaE2HSz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 03:18:55 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:56688 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752309AbaE2HSy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 03:18:54 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Linus Torvalds , Dave Chinner , Jens Axboe Cc: Minchan Kim , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Dave Hansen , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] x86_64: expand kernel stack to 16K In-Reply-To: References: <1401260039-18189-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <1401260039-18189-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <20140528223142.GO8554@dastard> <20140529013007.GF6677@dastard> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:31:27 +0930 Message-ID: <87oayh6s3s.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > Well, we've definitely have had some issues with deeper callchains > with md, but I suspect virtio might be worse, and the new blk-mq code > is lilkely worse in this respect too. I looked at this; I've now got a couple of virtio core cleanups, and I'm testing with Minchan's config and gcc versions now. MST reported that gcc 4.8 is a better than 4.6, but I'll test that too. Cheers, Rusty.