From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752775AbZHBPin (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:38:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752786AbZHBPim (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:38:42 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.ad.jp ([210.171.162.6]:51550 "EHLO mail.officemail.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbZHBPil (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:38:41 -0400 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [review] fat/nls: Fix handling of utf8 invalid char References: Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:38:39 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Alan Stern's message of "Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:21:14 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87ocqyfcow.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.10/RELEASE, bases: 24052007 #308098, status: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Stern writes: >> So, to make sure, could you review this if you have time? > > I don't know about the changes to namei_vfat.c, but the changes to > nls_base.c look fine. And since, as you say, VFAT is the only user of > utf8s_to_utf16s(), it shouldn't cause any problems elsewhere. Thanks for reviewing this. -- OGAWA Hirofumi