From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AACD4381E8A for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 15:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788537350; cv=none; b=srkjk1Ag5Y9c+DtctesaNc8K6GmQZUF9zXCSHin0L0sYdKGPHeXi5QwmqnZ3YGd8cZ6qDKaLKmiwTeVOqxv/9yRK7MQd3DZhf/JL2GuMOHivWAEXd7oE3NLAmucX7OtXwVFxu07wGVKxAU5swIWk8YAjUltWLlU7GA2cduKjepU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788537350; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M3WajPatnE0mWYQmmAzrdJhQoPdwi8cUHui9t50gSro=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lBfuc7H42lywN1R45IvEAZ4hvOS6lY0WDEW1SibQQqSX37trD5Y73jqxUS8v/sgMvN0TXIR7tl0ID2bUVdKZaYaeWbTrYKRrhg2gsl5d3lFPLXX/3Ukl+GRSuramwL/WI+lMwiMqGv3IIZN56ExKn/RWuFuZyQgODeTLj+f68LQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=n3HNDH4G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="n3HNDH4G" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA54C1F00A3D; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 15:55:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788537349; bh=60gpO03ThxnVGQt9XlytEMoGdzSGk1VBaaogieREs9Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=n3HNDH4GzQBQsmaToRAjjFqqL9Lv9N9ZnzVc60lFLKo3lxkUVDw5bhWfhgTCmWTBh FWhbsesG8KEOLIvPbBFY+uOc5aCJl+fTF7Tfxu8JMVDF4q5IwEHrd6j1vifdGaVdqY X3h8QSKiZ8Ra/4kk9K5YOVnh5AW5iBtMVPHYmG6kzxFjneNj7etbsrYPXvYvLX8PkW vOnG6u0bvBqVRpMzFLCsy14HZImTK+nISjdwz0fpc40uyp9DxeKFF5QSofDL8muL5V FL3br0kg7w5wJ4296VfT11s2rEbZzAtfWiSB5A95xckkjxrEb1yzjDZl5j8d5gAXdI YVjQC6QtIbsmw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] x86: Define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 17:55:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87pkyt6mf3.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X86 exits from interrupts with interrupts disabled, but it does not have __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED defined. So it ends up with a pointless local_irq_disable() in __irq_exit_rcu() instead of just validating that interrupts are disabled on a lockdep build. Add the missing define. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner