From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk/stop_machine: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs a stopper callback
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 21:11:27 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pkz3o03s.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827-defer-legacy-console-write-on-multi_cpu_stop-v1-0-3b9f6bb4679f@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 2026-08-27, Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> A device using a legacy UART console (console=ttyMSM0,115200n8) hit a
> watchdog bark/bite about 40 seconds after boot.
>
> stop_machine() (used here for kprobe text patching) stops every CPU by
> running multi_cpu_stop() on each of them, through the per-CPU
> "migration/%u" threads. These threads run at a higher priority than the
> msm_watchdog thread. At bite time, all eight CPUs were still spinning in
> multi_cpu_stop()'s MULTI_STOP_PREPARE state, where interrupts are left
> enabled.
>
> Heavy SELinux denial logging had built up a large backlog on the
> console. One CPU took an interrupt while spinning in MULTI_STOP_PREPARE.
> Handling it eventually led to a printk(), and because the console was a
> legacy console, that printk() synchronously drained the whole backlog
> over the slow UART. While the drain was still running, the watchdog bark
> interrupt hit the same CPU, found no recent pet, and escalated to a
> bite.
>
> The captured stack for that CPU, innermost frame first:
>
> qcom_soc_set_wdt_bite
> qcom_wdt_bark_handler
> __handle_irq_event_percpu
> handle_irq_event
> handle_fasteoi_irq
> generic_handle_domain_irq
> gic_handle_irq
> do_interrupt_handler
> el1_interrupt
> el1h_64_irq_handler
> el1h_64_irq
> console_flush_all
> console_unlock
> vprintk_emit
> dev_vprintk_emit
> dev_printk_emit
> __dev_printk
> _dev_err
> btspi_sleep_timeout_handler
> call_timer_fn
> __run_timer_base
> run_timer_softirq
> handle_softirqs
> __do_softirq
> ____do_softirq
> call_on_irq_stack
> do_softirq_own_stack
> __irq_exit_rcu
> irq_exit_rcu
> el1_interrupt
> el1h_64_irq_handler
> el1h_64_irq
> multi_cpu_stop
> cpu_stopper_thread
> smpboot_thread_fn
> kthread
> ret_from_fork
>
> Every other CPU stayed parked in the rendezvous the whole time, since
> their stopper threads outrank msm_watchdog. Nothing could pet the
> watchdog until the drain finished.
>
> This was observed through multi_cpu_stop(), but the hazard is not
> specific to it. Every cpu stopper callback runs in stop_sched_class,
> above msm_watchdog and every other thread on the CPU, so a slow flush
> from any of them (including single-CPU callbacks such as the migration
> and task-migration stoppers) can starve the watchdog just as well. The
> fix therefore covers all stopper callbacks, not only multi_cpu_stop().
>
> Fix this by having the cpu stopper mark the CPU active while a callback
> runs, and having printk use that marker to defer legacy console flushes
> until the callback returns:
>
> 1/2 stop_machine: Track when a CPU executes a stopper callback
>
> Add a per-CPU flag, set in the stopper dispatch path around the
> callback, and an in_cpu_stop() accessor.
>
> 2/2 printk: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs a stopper callback
>
> Route legacy console output through the offload path instead of
> flushing it directly while a CPU is inside a stopper callback, and
> flush it once the callback returns. Emergency and panic output is
> unaffected.
>
> Reproduced and verified with an out-of-tree test module that triggers
> stop_machine() with a queued console backlog and a printk() inside the
> rendezvous, paired with a kprobe-based script that flags any console
> flush happening while a CPU is inside a stopper callback.
This is a fairly heavy series just to address a problem with legacy
consoles that has always existed.
How about instead a series to switch msm_serial.c/qcom_geni_serial.c
over to NBCON? That is fairly straightforward (especially with the
availability of CON_NBCON_ATOMIC_UNSAFE) and would help to move the
kernel forward rather than improving the parts we are trying to get rid
of.
I would even be willing to convert those 2 drivers if you could provide
the necessary testing for me.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 5:20 Aditya Chillara
2026-08-27 5:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] stop_machine: Track when a CPU executes " Aditya Chillara
2026-08-27 5:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] printk: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs " Aditya Chillara
2026-08-27 19:05 ` John Ogness [this message]
2026-08-28 8:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] printk/stop_machine: " John Ogness
2026-08-28 10:06 ` Aditya Chillara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pkz3o03s.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®