From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
coverity-bot <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Fix 'using uninitialized value' Coverity warning
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:53:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmcwd4fz.fsf@ovpn-194-152.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4odRLlFRj17tUNE@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> In kvm_hv_flush_tlb(), 'data_offset' and 'consumed_xmm_halves' variables
>> are used in a mutually exclusive way: in 'hc->fast' we count in 'XMM
>> halves' and increase 'data_offset' otherwise. Coverity discovered, that in
>> one case both variables are incremented unconditionally. This doesn't seem
>> to cause any issues as the only user of 'data_offset'/'consumed_xmm_halves'
>> data is kvm_hv_get_tlb_flush_entries() -> kvm_hv_get_hc_data() which also
>> takes into account 'hc->fast' but is still worth fixing.
>
> If those calls aren't inlined, then 32-bit Hyper-V will be "consuming" uninitialized
> data when pushing parameters onto the stack. It won't cause real problems, but
> checkers might complain.
>
> What about shoving this metadata into "struct kvm_hv_hcall" as a union? That'd
> help convey that the two are mutually exclusive, would provide a place to document
> said exclusion, and would yield a nice cleanup too by eliminating multiple params
> from various functions.
"struct kvm_hv_hcall" used to hold raw data from the guest and
'consumed_xmm_halves'/ 'data_offset' are rather our implementation
details, how we consume these data. I don't see why we can't re-purpose
it a little bit to hold both, let me try that in v2.
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-02 10:58 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-12-02 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-06 13:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmcwd4fz.fsf@ovpn-194-152.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®