mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Randolf Pohl <randolf.pohl@gmx.de>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
	stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [46/74] net: restore ip source validation
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:55:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pr4jxuzl.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1mxzn8mj5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:17:50 -0800")

On 2010-02-05 21:17 +0100, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Bah.  That DEVINET_SYSCTL_ENTRY requires having a binary sysctl
> assigned, just to use as an index.
>
> Which of course trips over all of the fine checks in sysctl_check.c to
> keep people from assigning new binary sysctls by accident.
>
> That is the only place in the kernel where he have that problem, I wonder
> how much work it will be to finish untangling.

Isn't that already done in 2.6.33, looking at commit 83ac201b ?  Forgive
my ignorance, I am a layman.

Sen

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-05 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-05 14:34 Randolf Pohl
2010-02-05 14:51 ` jamal
2010-02-05 16:04   ` Sven Joachim
2010-02-05 20:17     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-05 20:55       ` Sven Joachim [this message]
2010-02-05 22:21         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-05 22:21         ` Eric W. Biederman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-04 17:18 [00/74] 2.6.32.8-stable review Greg KH
2010-02-04 17:12 ` [46/74] net: restore ip source validation Greg KH
2010-02-05 10:16   ` Sven Joachim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pr4jxuzl.fsf@turtle.gmx.de \
    --to=svenjoac@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randolf.pohl@gmx.de \
    --cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome