From: Samium Gromoff <deepfire@ibe.miee.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arch Users Mailing List <gnu-arch-users@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:26:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ptfw5oqb.wl@drakkar.ibe.miee.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031113144454.GA2502@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu>
At Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:44:54 -0500,
Jan Harkes wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > Okay, folks. Now i propose to go further than that.
> >
> > I hope that Larry recognises that at some point the linux kernel community
> > _will_ switch to a free software alternative.
> >
> > I think we should have a better choice than the lossy bk->cvs.
> >
> > I propose we as a whole ask Larry to create a bk->arch gateway _not_ via cvs
> > but directly, and therefore using all the extended metadata possible.
>
> I appreciate Arch and am actually using it for some things, and can't
> give an educated opinion on BK as I have never used it.
>
> But this is just ridiculous.
>
> First of all, there always serious pain in switching. Whatever free
> alternative is provided better be _a lot_ better compared to what is
> currently used. And although Arch might be more in-line with the
> political goals of many developers, frankly I don't believe Arch is
> technologically there yet.
You miss my point.
I don`t call for switching (although would like it to happen).
I call for a _better replacement for bk->cvs_.
bk->cvs loses data, which could be captured in a more sensible manner
than cvs is.
(I think that everyone agrees here that it`s not even remotely arguable)
bk->arch would regain that data back to our hands, thats what i`m proposing.
(here i presume that that data being constantly lost _is_ really useful)
> But then asking Larry to implement a gateway seems to be the plan of the
> century. Hey why doesn't Larry help out with the Arch or SVN effort
> while he's at it? How would you react if ClearCase started demanding
> that Arch/SVN/CVS developers should implement a one-directional
> gateway to their software to make it easier for people to migrate.
I decide to conveniently skip answering that part.
(That`s a suggestion to use your imagination here, really)
> Jan
regards, Samium Gromoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-13 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-13 12:59 Samium Gromoff
2003-11-13 14:44 ` Jan Harkes
2003-11-13 14:26 ` Samium Gromoff [this message]
2003-11-13 14:38 ` [Gnu-arch-users] " Samium Gromoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ptfw5oqb.wl@drakkar.ibe.miee.ru \
--to=deepfire@ibe.miee.ru \
--cc=gnu-arch-users@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®