From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E72D35950; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758820719; cv=none; b=uUrU1LywIjsMY77fP2DxfMOEKc648SNULVvwby3nUfqcYEu483sN8UgzNiVbbgDhw/qRRWKVPiH4r5scanbqWOPBeMCw1PvN4aIiy1S8+cxklX0mKvR+Z896FuHRBXN6mde2nqAeBmVj0ZYEgeht4YM8+D0CA6P9VI+5WPOryTU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758820719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jYaGC2W307AcjKp10yv8xV/E7xq8yq9f5BboueFwMME=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pOdEx8PxKbHk4KYM//BfNcwxsV9bpdCf7d+G9D1yEmIWxo8JFgoowi8Mb/SZPtFe8QKXTGR4lw48faBe1Bo43Wa4d0umO1p7fFVmGCqcdZsvGHwfHY+Ebf6/p+4DyTDKka1i8tcuh6ZMv4ow+LphGQtuHsctBawTh2CRB/JS/I4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=R0Wn+1ob; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="R0Wn+1ob" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net A312E406FA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1758820716; bh=s5E6NQtQfTfIKPQQ0U9jD4/CMTy4US3OKTTLePkEQTI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=R0Wn+1obn8KJeQvchJRf2wnbf497DYVq2eKLFn6QktuoOjJ3ybxEAFLi03ACkYszP aV/OjxtFF+hU4Tsh169FcOQDax4qxVQ9VTRQ5PJJSjch78kboyCe+GLpFs9u3faXwK sLzdeUNWhiACyJ/ZAjFBZLz6tdfkBQ6C8B7WndqpWsfVcZvxEwMZH1A4qhyV9lZo3Q b2wTCYQQXw6BYIqMZBrOclNa/e8um3UEGq8N8lfZ1blNtXGR699/rVD18qJIcDrCWL 7pPTqB2KjqyLNniqzC3PcY5nELWvyV6nwZIgjgws1HbGWRaL1WoJz8JVj6dHvLD/SZ AqCkRcme8WerA== Received: from localhost (mi-18-37-83.service.infuturo.it [151.18.37.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A312E406FA; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:18:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Lukas Bulwahn , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lukas Bulwahn Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/features: Update feature lists for 6.17-rc7 In-Reply-To: <20250925073634.112142-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> References: <20250925073634.112142-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:18:31 -0600 Message-ID: <87qzvu30yg.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lukas Bulwahn writes: > From: Lukas Bulwahn > > It seems that ./Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh was most > recently used in December 2022, with the latest kernel release v6.1-rc7 at > that time (see commit 7f2e60ff51ca ("Documentation/features: Update feature > lists for 6.1") to update the feature lists in this subdirectory. All > further changes to Documentation/features/ since then have probably been > done manually, without checking for changes in other architectures and > features, that missed to update this part of the documentation. > > Running ./Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh now showed > seven changes of supported features in various architectures (one in arc, > two in parisc, one in riscv, one in openrisc, and two in um), which were > not reflected yet in the current documentation. > > To confirm the sanity of this script's suggested changes, I checked if the > commit messages confirm that the features have in fact been added in the > following commits: > > - commit f122668ddcce ("ARC: Add eBPF JIT support") > - commit 4800a6215e33 ("parisc: Wire up eBPF JIT compiler") > - commit a869b8c29f86 ("riscv: enable mseal sysmap for RV64") > - commit 2f681ba4b352 ("um: move thread info into task") > - commit 3f17fed21491 ("um: switch to regset API and depend on XSTATE") > - commit 7ce8716e2769 ("openrisc: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API support") > - commit b5ff52be8913 ("parisc: Convert to generic clockevents") > > So, update all documents to the current state with features-refresh.sh. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn > --- > Documentation/features/core/eBPF-JIT/arch-support.txt | 4 ++-- > .../features/core/mseal_sys_mappings/arch-support.txt | 2 +- > .../features/core/thread-info-in-task/arch-support.txt | 2 +- > Documentation/features/core/tracehook/arch-support.txt | 2 +- > Documentation/features/perf/kprobes-event/arch-support.txt | 2 +- > Documentation/features/time/clockevents/arch-support.txt | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) OK, I went ahead and applied this one, thanks. jon