From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fscache: fix race between enablement and dropping of object
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:16:29 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2gd44hu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1887 bytes --]
It was observed that a process blocked indefintely in
__fscache_read_or_alloc_page(), waiting for FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP
to be cleared via fscache_wait_for_deferred_lookup().
At this time, ->backing_objects was empty, which would normaly prevent
__fscache_read_or_alloc_page() from getting to the point of waiting.
This implies that ->backing_objects was cleared *after*
__fscache_read_or_alloc_page was was entered.
When an object is "killed" and then "dropped",
FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP is cleared in fscache_lookup_failure(), then
KILL_OBJECT and DROP_OBJECT are "called" and only in DROP_OBJECT is
->backing_objects cleared. This leaves a window where
something else can set FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP and
__fscache_read_or_alloc_page() can start waiting, before
->backing_objects is cleared
There is some uncertainty in this analysis, but it seems to be fit the
observations. Adding the wake in this patch will be handled correctly
by __fscache_read_or_alloc_page(), as it checks if ->backing_objects
is empty again, after waiting.
Customer which reported the hang, also report that the hang cannot be
reproduced with this fix.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
fs/fscache/object.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/fscache/object.c b/fs/fscache/object.c
index 9edc920f651f..6d9cb1719de5 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/object.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/object.c
@@ -730,6 +730,9 @@ static const struct fscache_state *fscache_drop_object(struct fscache_object *ob
if (awaken)
wake_up_bit(&cookie->flags, FSCACHE_COOKIE_INVALIDATING);
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP, &cookie->flags))
+ wake_up_bit(&cookie->flags, FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP);
+
/* Prevent a race with our last child, which has to signal EV_CLEARED
* before dropping our spinlock.
--
2.14.0.rc0.dirty
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 6:16 NeilBrown [this message]
2018-11-28 15:12 ` David Howells
2018-11-28 20:18 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r2gd44hu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®