mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
	"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] x86/kvm/nVMX: introduce source data cache for kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu()
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:30:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2hgnp3r.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180926150556.GI27433@linux.intel.com>

Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:58:42PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> MMU re-initialization is expensive, in particular,
>> update_permission_bitmask() and update_pkru_bitmask() are.
>> 
>> Cache the data used to setup shadow EPT MMU and avoid full re-init when
>> it is unchanged.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 14 +++++++++
>>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 1821b0215230..87ddaa1579e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -274,7 +274,21 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
>>  };
>>  
>>  union kvm_mmu_extended_role {
>> +/*
>> + * This structure complements kvm_mmu_page_role caching everything needed for
>> + * MMU configuration. If nothing in both these structures changed, MMU
>> + * re-configuration can be skipped. @valid bit is set on first usage so we don't
>> + * treat all-zero structure as valid data.
>> + */
>>  	u32 word;
>> +	struct {
>> +		unsigned int valid:1;
>> +		unsigned int execonly:1;
>> +		unsigned int cr4_pse:1;
>> +		unsigned int cr4_pke:1;
>> +		unsigned int cr4_smap:1;
>> +		unsigned int cr4_smep:1;
>> +	};
>>  };
>>  
>>  union kvm_mmu_role {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index bb1ef0f68f8e..d8611914544a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -4708,6 +4708,24 @@ static void paging32E_init_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  	paging64_init_context_common(vcpu, context, PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static union kvm_mmu_role
>> +kvm_calc_mmu_role_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	union kvm_mmu_role role = {0};
>> +
>> +	role.base.access = ACC_ALL;
>> +	role.base.cr0_wp = is_write_protection(vcpu);
>> +
>> +	role.ext.cr4_smep = kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMEP) != 0;
>> +	role.ext.cr4_smap = kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMAP) != 0;
>> +	role.ext.cr4_pse = !!is_pse(vcpu);
>> +	role.ext.cr4_pke = kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_PKE) != 0;
>> +
>> +	role.ext.valid = 1;
>> +
>> +	return role;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static union kvm_mmu_page_role
>>  kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>> @@ -4814,16 +4832,18 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_shadow_mmu);
>>  
>> -static union kvm_mmu_page_role
>> -kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool accessed_dirty)
>> +static union kvm_mmu_role
>> +kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool accessed_dirty,
>> +				   bool execonly)
>>  {
>> -	union kvm_mmu_page_role role = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.base;
>> +	union kvm_mmu_role role = kvm_calc_mmu_role_common(vcpu);
>
> kvm_calc_mmu_role_common() doesn't preserve the current mmu_role.base
> and kvm_calc_mmu_role_common() doesn't capture all base fields.  Won't
> @role will be incorrect for base fields that aren't set below, e.g.
> cr4_pae, smep_andnot_wp, smap_andnot_wp, etc...

Oh, I see what you mean. Actually, PATCH8 of this series adds some of
this stuff but smep_andnot_wp and smap_andnot_wp are still not set. I
think I'll enhance kvm_calc_mmu_role_common() and move some stuff from
PATCH8 to this one.
(The fact that @role is currently not fully re-initialized here is very
unobvious so I would definitely prefer to explicitly initialize
everything over inheriting something from previously initialized role).

Thanks!

>
>>  
>> -	role.level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>> -	role.direct = false;
>> -	role.ad_disabled = !accessed_dirty;
>> -	role.guest_mode = true;
>> -	role.access = ACC_ALL;
>> +	role.base.level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>> +	role.base.direct = false;
>> +	role.base.ad_disabled = !accessed_dirty;
>> +	role.base.guest_mode = true;
>> +
>> +	role.ext.execonly = execonly;
>>  
>>  	return role;
>>  }
>> @@ -4832,10 +4852,16 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
>>  			     bool accessed_dirty, gpa_t new_eptp)
>>  {
>>  	struct kvm_mmu *context = vcpu->arch.mmu;
>> -	union kvm_mmu_page_role root_page_role =
>> -		kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(vcpu, accessed_dirty);
>> +	union kvm_mmu_role new_role =
>> +		kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(vcpu, accessed_dirty,
>> +						   execonly);
>> +
>> +	__kvm_mmu_new_cr3(vcpu, new_eptp, new_role.base, false);
>> +
>> +	new_role.base.word &= mmu_base_role_mask.word;
>> +	if (new_role.as_u64 == context->mmu_role.as_u64)
>> +		return;
>>  
>> -	__kvm_mmu_new_cr3(vcpu, new_eptp, root_page_role, false);
>>  	context->shadow_root_level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>>  
>>  	context->nx = true;
>> @@ -4847,8 +4873,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
>>  	context->update_pte = ept_update_pte;
>>  	context->root_level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
>>  	context->direct_map = false;
>> -	context->mmu_role.base.word =
>> -		root_page_role.word & mmu_base_role_mask.word;
>> +	context->mmu_role.as_u64 = new_role.as_u64;
>>  	context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
>>  
>>  	update_permission_bitmask(vcpu, context, true);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>> 

-- 
Vitaly

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-25 17:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/kvm/nVMX: optimize MMU switch between L1 and L2 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] x86/kvm/mmu: make vcpu->mmu a pointer to the current MMU Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:17   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86/kvm/mmu.c: set get_pdptr hook in kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-26 17:16     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/kvm/mmu.c: add kvm_mmu parameter to kvm_mmu_free_roots() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/kvm/mmu: introduce guest_mmu Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-26 17:18     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/kvm/mmu: get rid of redundant kvm_mmu_setup() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86/kvm/mmu: make space for source data caching in struct kvm_mmu Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 14:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-26 17:19     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] x86/kvm/nVMX: introduce source data cache for kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 15:06   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-26 17:30     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2018-09-27 13:44       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] x86/kvm/mmu: check if tdp/shadow MMU reconfiguration is needed Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 15:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/kvm/mmu: check if MMU reconfiguration is needed in init_kvm_nested_mmu() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-09-26 15:17   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r2hgnp3r.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome