From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933065AbcDYQDo (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:44 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:11296 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932948AbcDYQDm (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,533,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="966096283" From: Alexander Shishkin To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net, eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mathieu Poirier Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] perf: Introduce address range filtering In-Reply-To: <20160425131959.GE3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1461251823-12416-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <1461251823-12416-5-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <20160422074555.GB3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87zisl8vls.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160425131959.GE3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:37 +0300 Message-ID: <87r3dt8yli.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:19:11PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >> @@ -393,12 +405,64 @@ struct pmu { >> void (*free_aux) (void *aux); /* optional */ >> >> /* >> + * Validate address range filters: make sure hw supports the >> + * requested configuration and number of filters; return 0 if the >> + * supplied filters are valid, -errno otherwise. >> + */ >> + int (*addr_filters_validate) (struct list_head *filters); >> + /* optional */ >> + >> + /* >> + * Synchronize address range filter configuration: >> + * translate hw-agnostic filter into hardware configuration in >> + * event::hw::addr_filters. >> + */ >> + void (*addr_filters_sync) (struct perf_event *event); >> + /* optional */ > > So these two are not serialized the 'normal' way right? Does that want > more comment? Yes, will see to it. Thanks, -- Alex