From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752706Ab3I0Aih (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:38:37 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo02.lge.com ([156.147.1.126]:52542 "EHLO LGEAMRELO02.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834Ab3I0Aig (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400 X-AuditID: 9c93017e-b7ca5ae0000013bb-d5-5244d3880384 From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Jiri Olsa , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile References: <1379297476-20793-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20130920230132.GK9574@pd.tnic> <878uynrjaa.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20130923092659.GD2527@pd.tnic> <87vc1qprny.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20130924170842.GA2634@ghostprotocols.net> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:38:32 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20130924170842.GA2634@ghostprotocols.net> (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of "Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:08:42 -0300") Message-ID: <87r4cbp08n.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaldo, On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:08:42 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:09:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: >> I don't know. I just thought there's not much thing we can do for those >> files other than shutting up all warnings. > >> But if you think that's not the right thing, I'll keep the existing >> options. What do you think, Arnaldo? > > I think keeping the existing options is the right thing to do, if some > of that can be simplified or made like you did it in your patch, then > that is the matter for a separate patch, with proper explanation. Okay, I'll just keep them and resend v2. Thanks, Namhyung