From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Avishay Traeger <AVISHAY@il.ibm.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for virtio standardization.
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:16:51 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4p76las.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009160201.5303a7ca@BR9GNB5Z>
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:59:33 +0930
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> 3) Various clarifications, formalizations and cleanups to the spec text,
>> and possibly elimination of old deprecated features.
>>
>> 4) The only significant change to the spec is that we use PCI
>> capabilities, so we can have infinite feature bits.
>> (see
>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-December/019198.html)
>
> "Infinite" only applies to virtio-pci, no?
Yes, you already have "infinite" feature bits for ccw, as does every bus
we did since PCI.
> Sounds like a good idea. I'll be happy to review the spec with an eye
> to virtio-ccw.
Thanks!
Rusty.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-27 0:29 Rusty Russell
2012-10-04 18:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 14:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-10-10 3:46 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4p76las.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=AVISHAY@il.ibm.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®