From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9051C29B781 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 06:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788503647; cv=none; b=NdxLWPL+dKZ5LQ68hj6Sx33wFS9hxbMox01HbJyURo55+kYZso72zCKWDCE0ScjB/qapueu5LHs8nylhrr9ZNn2I592dergXokCzh72fvy5sv0oLpYUAdo2Ur0y/poSePgNJ/KEF78WOiBfBHgreCuQJ7WrESoRWv/z0npWEwIY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788503647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4pJbyjG9MKJWAE9GxtVtEeFuCkCsAbCpu0WttTgVRp8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uiGQMW+NcTND6C0fAXdH81IS8FUM9LWPPhadkIk+ORLheFLPeLr+0x7CnDP9Akz6QWcGtkzLkVqGd3HS/hr1iLiU290TC/Lno6It8fPRP0lMd/fWpJ1VVSKp92sRrck4CFoDebuSvGKotSMCtucI6++DjP1S7ewAajKTXQENl40= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lMIQYEDH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lMIQYEDH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 681BC1F00A3D; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 06:34:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788503646; bh=ZFl8CqTY+R6cYlglIG1ZutosKrICQ4Qsj7l470yDFds=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lMIQYEDHoNnJ7bXahMQhl355p0JYXlYmtChSYQvL/hgjn/ww5o+3GTrwqta3p42Cy A2NBxe8q8SEWAzOVSQorMND1MlrRTkUM1cDQASi2Nje0kvnBoIgTeRh6brXGgzBtV4 13AJ76BBi/Ka9xIx0sNynImhs7m2Od5Eu4ZXChHSfHxV21HOxaZoAQ2z3dv8uevIRG cmLXuzY+z7FyhXex9K7FSAUrlDsTuFmhKR4GlN/VKlpuD8CLDXl33YZvLxnLeZSVoh J3CT1Vha/JfOEIYnlXjyX7IQte7JSK/KcgVR/gvSK/ZLxCRKZ7t3qzsU9j0nLOZLUU dIes9fSb2zYFQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" , Radu Rendec , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Dongliang Mu Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqdomain: Delete irq_domain_add_linear() In-Reply-To: <20260901064716.253399-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> References: <20260901064716.253399-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:34:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87se3p8qzo.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Sep 01 2026 at 08:47, Jiri Slaby wrote: > 7.3-rc1 is free of calls to irq_domain_add_linear(), so it can be > deleted at last. > > I used Gemini to update zh_CN/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst too. Hopefully > the result is correct -- I really cannot read/write Chinese ("CHINESE > DOCUMENTATION" maintainers CCed). It's trivial enough to translate the whole paragraph with Gemini or google translate: "irq_domain_add_linear() and irq_domain_create_linear() are functionally equivalent, except for the first parameter: the former accepts an Open Firmware-specific 'struct device_node', while the latter accepts a more generic abstract 'struct fwnode_handle'." which makes it obvious that it can be deleted completely, no? Thanks, tglx