From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B64176FCF; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726004428; cv=none; b=Rb2lhvXrz8DOwE3vH7ciaocR7Kv6eLWPlXu/LeglKigLTyH4Mw2PveSNp9B4YBhqBZbIUldwPk7d7CiyL70hZC23gPha52Nc+tWUcREpIsNdCd+BZcuZWopLOS3Ck3nh2PKFAiWOp/CBtDmCeJytj4e5CH0MWwT8Ql0e058ArFM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726004428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RrMh1hfl9glONOa/WfjbGVI4RuWn97+g9zY0JfmpDDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HCylODNQGmOGrvYWjCMNULIFS0rmBac1/+5r7zxKAr5HBE17qYg7wWYpZdapgzyH6snrcunz2CVaMXPJ5Rxf3YaVpjZ2JBqw49HYPNVD8ucKY+6MQmQb3GuE4exMcemZnyYGb5JexeW2a4GjIIXJhHlT2gKsDKdo6WBNKBHdbbM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=A0qlvZfc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="A0qlvZfc" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 645954188E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1726004426; bh=XVhWwf4U2d0wtmoDDSbpRb+OchS2TLIsAXcMaWYZdTw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=A0qlvZfcBJECqiniq3Kwy9VUMaxCoz8WFW2Rud5C5+kXYyzfTye1+E17gclA0TVly uL/kxyyMGloWXY6P2iVjutwv3wo/SbypPiXXd+jhhBae8iuj/Xt+fi1Je3DSYL2KzP JQ9b4TV7vloYYSOXWUfPq+TFkBophkvV5jf8DhmU5qhU2D14kHnUlj64nX5YdPq0wJ 3Om9qItXX0y7WK3FKVwZNU3/GZnz+AGwDOmXc8h5wcK0Fotxp/tsrTUeg4e0J0IQHu ARm4IVvXKcLqqNN+UtCpZ4iy6INuWpvPTBNtbPzsb3sRQY13DRoZVPbL6hs9FW4CQC DlH3wAwSxZ/CA== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 645954188E; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:40:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: jiang.kun2@zte.com.cn, alexs@kernel.org, siyanteng@loongson.cn, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, fan.yu9@zte.com.cn, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, he.peilin@zte.com.cn, tu.qiang35@zte.com.cn, qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn, Pengyu Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/mm: Translate physical_memory.rst to Simplified Chinese In-Reply-To: <20240904112020232OieLhsFZ_M10gBxJtUieP@zte.com.cn> References: <20240904112020232OieLhsFZ_M10gBxJtUieP@zte.com.cn> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:40:25 -0600 Message-ID: <87seu75gs6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain writes: > From: Yaxin Wang > > This patch translates the "physical_memory.rst" document into > Simplified Chinese to improve accessibility for Chinese-speaking > developers and users. > > The translation was done with attention to technical accuracy > and readability, ensuring that the document remains informative > and useful in its translated form. > > Signed-off-by: Yaxin Wang So I have a couple of simplified-Chinese translations (this one and 20240830133230.7988-1-zpenya1314@gmail.com) sitting in my queue, but I have no way to evaluate them for accuracy. Is there anybody who can help to review these? Thanks, jon