mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry: Fix entry/exit mismatch on failed fast 32-bit syscalls
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:24:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sg5n5bfr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0025117242488a30621fb9858918802532f9ee9.1614059335.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Feb 22 2021 at 21:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On a 32-bit fast syscall that fails to read its arguments from user
> memory, the kernel currently does syscall exit work but not
> syscall exit work.

and this sentence does not make any sense.

> This would confuse audit and ptrace.

Would? It does confuse it, right?

> This is a minimal fix intended for ease of backporting.  A more
> complete cleanup is coming.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 0b085e68f407 ("x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 0904f5676e4d..cf4dcf346ca8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		regs->ax = -EFAULT;
>  
>  		instrumentation_end();
> -		syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> +		local_irq_disable();
> +		exit_to_user_mode();

While I suggested this with tired brain yesterday night, it's not really
correct as it does not go through exit_to_user_mode_prepare() which it
really has to.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23  5:50 [PATCH 0/3] x86/entry: A compat syscall bugfix and some test stuff Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-23  5:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] entry: Check that syscall entries and syscall exits match Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-23  5:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry: Fix entry/exit mismatch on failed fast 32-bit syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-23 10:24   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-02-23 11:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-23 15:35     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-23  5:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/x86: Add a missing .note.GNU-stack section to thunks_32.S Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sg5n5bfr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®