mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] entry: Guard syscall_enter_audit() invocation with CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 10:43:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tso45bqq.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875x0k7i9k.ffs@fw13>

A bunch of older cross compilers notably RISCV64 and S390 fail to eliminate
the dead code when CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=n. The code in question is:

     if (unlikely(audit_context())
     	syscall_enter_audit(regs);

and in case of CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=n:

  static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void)
  {
        return NULL;
  }

which should make the compiler eliminate the syscall_enter_audit()
call. But a RISV64 GCC12 cross compiler translates that into:

        if (unlikely(audit_context()))
    1c34:       00000097                auipc   ra,0x0
    1c38:       000080e7                jalr    ra # 1c34 <.L785>
    1c3c:       c511                    beqz    a0,1c48 <.L787>
                syscall_enter_audit(regs);
    1c3e:       8526                    mv      a0,s1
    1c40:       00000097                auipc   ra,0x0
    1c44:       000080e7                jalr    ra # 1c40 <.L785+0xc>

and then claims in the failing link:

   include/asm-generic/preempt.h:54:(.noinstr.text+0x1a20):
	undefined reference to 'syscall_enter_audit'

which is obviously hallucination.

Add an explicit IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) check into the condition to
cure this compiler madness.

Fixes: 6f25517010dd ("entry: Rework syscall_audit_enter()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609031938.ZvZZaRQy-lkp@intel.com/
---
 include/linux/entry-common.h |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -102,7 +102,14 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
 	if (unlikely(work & SYSCALL_WORK_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
 		trace_syscall_enter(regs);
 
-	if (unlikely(audit_context()))
+	/*
+	 * The config check works around broken compilers which fail to
+	 * eliminate the dead code in case of CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=n as they
+	 * insist on creating a always false runtime condition based on
+	 * audit_context() which returns NULL in that case. The explicit
+	 * IS_ENABLED() check makes that madness go away.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) && unlikely(audit_context()))
 		syscall_enter_audit(regs);
 
 	return true;

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 11:35 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:218: undefined reference to `syscall_enter_audit' kernel test robot
2026-09-03 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-09-04 13:42   ` Philip Li
2026-09-04 22:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-09-05  8:43       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tso45bqq.ffs@fw13 \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=philip.li@intel.com \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®