From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:27:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu9ffp6j.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsl0na5m.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
<snip>
>
> Rob's point is that commit fee3ff99bc67 only moved existing code, the
> bug already existed.
>
> The function was introduced in:
>
> 467d27824920 ("powerpc: ima: get the kexec buffer passed by the previous kernel")
>
> So that's where the Fixes tag should point.
Thanks Mpe for explaining and apologies Rob as I initially didnt get the
point you made. I wrongly assumed that since the patch can only be
applied on top of commit fee3ff99bc67 hence fixes should point to
fee3ff99bc67.
I have sent out a v2 with the updated Fixes tag and also changes as
suggested by Mpe and Rob at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524055042.1527968-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com/
--
Cheers
~ Vaibhav
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 20:05 Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-18 20:30 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2022-05-20 10:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-05-20 22:30 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-22 22:51 ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-23 4:30 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-05-24 5:57 ` Vaibhav Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu9ffp6j.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com \
--to=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome