From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7DEC169C4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4F7218A1 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727475AbfBFDzV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 22:55:21 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:48006 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725981AbfBFDzV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 22:55:21 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x163rqAP165111 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 22:55:20 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qfr0u861g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:55:20 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:18 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:16 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x163tFb456688836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:15 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7154203F; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0664204C; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vajain21.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.109.195.142]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:55:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vajain21.in.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:25:12 +0530 From: Vaibhav Jain To: Stephen Rothwell , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the scsi-fixes tree In-Reply-To: <20190206072033.3d04f96b@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20190206072033.3d04f96b@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:25:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19020603-0020-0000-0000-000003132CC4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19020603-0021-0000-0000-000021642D6C Message-Id: <87tvhhmuzj.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-06_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=659 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902060028 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Martin, > > In commit > > bb61b843ffd4 ("scsi: cxlflash: Prevent deadlock when adapter probe fails") > > Fixes tag > > Fixes: c21e0bbfc485("cxlflash: Base support for IBM CXL Flash Adapter") > > has these problem(s): > > - missing space between the SHA1 and the subject Thanks for catching this Stephen. I am surprised that the checkpatch.pl script didnt catch this. Martin, should I resend the patch with this fixed ? Thanks, -- Vaibhav Jain Linux Technology Center, IBM India Pvt. Ltd.