From: kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: lkp@01.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Subject: [lkp] [selinux] 5d226df4ed: -10.1% unixbench.score
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:59:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twn32v0p.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4301 bytes --]
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux stable-4.5
commit 5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1 ("selinux: Revalidate invalid inode security labels")
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/ivb42/pipe/unixbench
commit:
6f3be9f562e3027c77bc4482ccf2cea8600a7f74
5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1
6f3be9f562e3027c 5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac27
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
2086 ± 0% -10.1% 1876 ± 0% unixbench.score
7.79 ± 0% -10.2% 7.00 ± 1% time.user_time
33404 ±117% +9470.5% 3196941 ±173% latency_stats.max.wait_on_page_bit.__filemap_fdatawait_range.filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors.sync_inodes_sb.sync_inodes_one_sb.iterate_supers.sys_sync.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
18934 ± 34% -82.8% 3252 ± 73% latency_stats.sum.rpc_wait_bit_killable.__rpc_execute.rpc_execute.rpc_run_task.nfs4_call_sync_sequence.[nfsv4]._nfs4_proc_access.[nfsv4].nfs4_proc_access.[nfsv4].nfs_do_access.nfs_permission.__inode_permission.inode_permission.link_path_walk
57519 ±100% +5478.5% 3208706 ±172% latency_stats.sum.wait_on_page_bit.__filemap_fdatawait_range.filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors.sync_inodes_sb.sync_inodes_one_sb.iterate_supers.sys_sync.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
13414 ± 33% +49.4% 20036 ± 8% numa-meminfo.node0.Active(anon)
13399 ± 33% +49.0% 19963 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
11624 ± 38% -52.7% 5495 ± 18% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(anon)
11518 ± 38% -52.6% 5457 ± 17% numa-meminfo.node1.AnonPages
1641 ± 50% -53.8% 757.75 ± 15% numa-meminfo.node1.PageTables
3353 ± 33% +49.2% 5004 ± 8% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_anon
3349 ± 33% +49.0% 4991 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
2904 ± 38% -52.7% 1374 ± 18% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
2878 ± 38% -52.6% 1365 ± 17% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
410.00 ± 50% -53.9% 189.00 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_page_table_pages
14760 ± 2% +207.2% 45336 ± 65% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other
ivb42: Ivytown Ivy Bridge-EP
Memory: 64G
unixbench.score
2150 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
2100 ++ .*..*.*.. |
| .*..* *.*..*. .*.*..*.* |
*.*..*.*..* *..*.*.*..*.*..*.*. |
2050 ++ |
| |
2000 ++ |
| |
1950 ++ |
| |
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
1900 ++ O O O O O O O O O O O |
| O O O O
1850 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
To reproduce:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp run job.yaml
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Ying Huang
[-- Attachment #2: job.yaml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3202 bytes --]
---
LKP_SERVER: inn
LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
testcase: unixbench
default-monitors:
wait: activate-monitor
kmsg:
uptime:
iostat:
vmstat:
numa-numastat:
numa-vmstat:
numa-meminfo:
proc-vmstat:
proc-stat:
interval: 10
meminfo:
slabinfo:
interrupts:
lock_stat:
latency_stats:
softirqs:
bdi_dev_mapping:
diskstats:
nfsstat:
cpuidle:
cpufreq-stats:
turbostat:
pmeter:
sched_debug:
interval: 60
cpufreq_governor: performance
default-watchdogs:
oom-killer:
watchdog:
commit: 5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1
model: Ivytown Ivy Bridge-EP
nr_cpu: 48
memory: 64G
swap_partitions: LABEL=SWAP
rootfs_partition: LABEL=LKP-ROOTFS
category: benchmark
nr_task: 1
unixbench:
test: pipe
queue: bisect
testbox: ivb42
tbox_group: ivb42
kconfig: x86_64-rhel
enqueue_time: 2015-12-25 13:29:46.074099003 +08:00
id: e7af06995961a9eaf78f120f46b7a5d210f9b7d4
user: lkp
compiler: gcc-4.9
head_commit: c1c82d8ca76e2b31f5487a59426aca47c69ac0c3
base_commit: 4ef7675344d687a0ef5b0d7c0cee12da005870c0
branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015122502
rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
result_root: "/result/unixbench/performance-1-pipe/ivb42/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1/0"
job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/ivb42/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-pipe-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1-20151225-1194-1b0xkn5-1.yaml"
max_uptime: 924.8199999999999
initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
bootloader_append:
- root=/dev/ram0
- user=lkp
- job=/lkp/scheduled/ivb42/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-pipe-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1-20151225-1194-1b0xkn5-1.yaml
- ARCH=x86_64
- kconfig=x86_64-rhel
- branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015122502
- commit=5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1
- BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc2-00009-g5d226df
- max_uptime=924
- RESULT_ROOT=/result/unixbench/performance-1-pipe/ivb42/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1/0
- LKP_SERVER=inn
- |2-
earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal
rw
lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1/modules.cgz"
bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/unixbench.cgz"
repeat_to: 2
kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc2-00009-g5d226df"
dequeue_time: 2015-12-25 13:40:07.935012417 +08:00
job_state: finished
loadavg: 0.69 0.34 0.13 1/523 4755
start_time: '1451022049'
end_time: '1451022179'
version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20151225-125308"
[-- Attachment #3: reproduce.sh --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 4538 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-28 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-28 1:59 kernel test robot [this message]
2016-01-04 22:27 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2016-01-04 22:41 ` Andreas Grünbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87twn32v0p.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®