From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754700AbbFWK7a (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:59:30 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:53738 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753437AbbFWK7W (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:59:22 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20150623181828.1269d960@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 05:53:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150623181828.1269d960@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:18:28 +1000") Message-ID: <87twty66gp.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+U7ipva5GsAW6Bj9D2RTQZqn2wIBaWk0A= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.205.90 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0005] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Stephen Rothwell X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 153 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.34 (0.2%), signal_user_changed: 8 (5.0%), b_tie_ro: 4.8 (3.1%), parse: 1.32 (0.9%), extract_message_metadata: 3.8 (2.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.80 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.8 (3.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.50 (1.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.24 (0.8%), tests_pri_-400: 16 (10.5%), check_bayes: 15 (9.7%), b_tokenize: 4.2 (2.7%), b_tok_get_all: 4.5 (2.9%), b_comp_prob: 1.65 (1.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (1.5%), b_finish: 0.78 (0.5%), tests_pri_0: 98 (63.9%), tests_pri_500: 6 (3.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 23 X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:52 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen could you please drop the kdbus tree? There was some significant work that was identified last merge window that has not yet been done, and who knows when it will be done. Certainly the recent sd-bus API announcement strongly suggests that there are no plans to perform such work. Having the kdbus tree in linux-next with the implicit suggestion that a pull request will be sent to Linus this merge window before the problems are addressed and we will have to repeat the mess from last merge window keeps me up at night. So to avoid the appearance that the kdbus folks are continuing to ignoring feedback can we please keep the kdbus tree out of linux-next until it is ready to be merged? Thank you, Eric