mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, yong.zhang0@gmail.com,
	jean.pihet@newoldbits.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:01:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txy5fs8q.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340205562-7653-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (Vincent Guittot's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:19:19 +0200")

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:19:19 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This factorization has also been proposed in another patchset that has not been
> merged yet:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080873.html
> So, this patch could be dropped depending of the state of the other one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>


> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/topology.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 51f23b3..eb5fc81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
>  	return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling;
>  }
>  
> +void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> +{
> +	struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	/* update core and thread sibling masks */
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> +
> +		if (cpuid_topo->socket_id != cpu_topo->socket_id)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> +		if (cpu != cpuid)
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> +
> +		if (cpuid_topo->core_id != cpu_topo->core_id)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> +		if (cpu != cpuid)
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> +	}
> +	smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * store_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
>   * and with the mutex cpu_hotplug.lock locked, when several cpus have booted,
> @@ -91,7 +117,6 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>  {
>  	struct cputopo_arm *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
>  	unsigned int mpidr;
> -	unsigned int cpu;
>  
>  	/* If the cpu topology has been already set, just return */
>  	if (cpuid_topo->core_id != -1)
> @@ -133,26 +158,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>  		cpuid_topo->socket_id = -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* update core and thread sibling masks */
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -		struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> -
> -		if (cpuid_topo->socket_id == cpu_topo->socket_id) {
> -			cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> -			if (cpu != cpuid)
> -				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> -					&cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> -
> -			if (cpuid_topo->core_id == cpu_topo->core_id) {
> -				cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid,
> -					&cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> -				if (cpu != cpuid)
> -					cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> -						&cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> -	smp_wmb();
> +	update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: thread %d, cpu %d, socket %d, mpidr %x\n",
>  		cpuid, cpu_topology[cpuid].thread_id,

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 15:19 [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks Vincent Guittot
2012-06-21  0:01   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information Vincent Guittot
2012-07-02  9:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 12:11     ` Vincent Guittot
2012-07-02 12:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] sched, x86: Remove broken power estimation Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87txy5fs8q.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®