From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, yong.zhang0@gmail.com,
jean.pihet@newoldbits.com,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:01:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txy5fs8q.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340205562-7653-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (Vincent Guittot's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:19:19 +0200")
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:19:19 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This factorization has also been proposed in another patchset that has not been
> merged yet:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080873.html
> So, this patch could be dropped depending of the state of the other one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 51f23b3..eb5fc81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling;
> }
>
> +void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> +{
> + struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> + int cpu;
> +
> + /* update core and thread sibling masks */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->socket_id != cpu_topo->socket_id)
> + continue;
> +
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->core_id != cpu_topo->core_id)
> + continue;
> +
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> + }
> + smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * store_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
> * and with the mutex cpu_hotplug.lock locked, when several cpus have booted,
> @@ -91,7 +117,6 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> {
> struct cputopo_arm *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> unsigned int mpidr;
> - unsigned int cpu;
>
> /* If the cpu topology has been already set, just return */
> if (cpuid_topo->core_id != -1)
> @@ -133,26 +158,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> cpuid_topo->socket_id = -1;
> }
>
> - /* update core and thread sibling masks */
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> -
> - if (cpuid_topo->socket_id == cpu_topo->socket_id) {
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> - if (cpu != cpuid)
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> - &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> -
> - if (cpuid_topo->core_id == cpu_topo->core_id) {
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid,
> - &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> - if (cpu != cpuid)
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> - &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> - }
> - }
> - }
> - smp_wmb();
> + update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: thread %d, cpu %d, socket %d, mpidr %x\n",
> cpuid, cpu_topology[cpuid].thread_id,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 15:19 [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks Vincent Guittot
2012-06-21 0:01 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information Vincent Guittot
2012-07-02 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 12:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-07-02 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] sched, x86: Remove broken power estimation Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 15:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87txy5fs8q.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®