From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B53E44AB81; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789501040; cv=none; b=tPZk2IspG92vssqbjOif2MdhCPZqd9RlEbUqG+Nm1Y23NwFYp2eLi9xn3M6fYL5lQQYVWj3mHbEgSRkaHRrZhsvNls95r40d+kDXsKjDkmm6YzPTrnWgEZBDgqjC9QEVnDF+cr2EeWWWsQ8xxeeD0n4lE7l2Gb6NXUkYC+qossI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789501040; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/zS2E4DbP6ytnjyakX6GxndaMsVS2D/+Wc9ZjtPH7U0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UZ64hjzpjg9onD+xt9exN350Wxd2+bCWWKlMxzpucl27qv+yMhi9/gIuwmSFhPUmcTk9nl647IA3vUruEJiN/6Qeiw/mQfdMj42A0NB+z1hzdNHD8ApD732d37Ask0aYH3uKk7Dxg28cbGBInINK00gS+5qFKc6JERMYzCp7lLk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Nsdy0ngz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Nsdy0ngz" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 158CE408B4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1789501036; bh=inm8Ih+/T2kfBW/aDAbkP84VqD0uHU+f+HG+z2efPXk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Nsdy0ngzhuqr8F7WM33MCjGS8Nmb0Br6maICdRGe8yjkNN5dYNBxtNdO8bEu26dvE LJzH0ak/V+Lhl7b3BdrZpP2yKaSpwaU6G0XZfmbwLvN8r0Un4KAQOLKOyfvnX5xIYd nBkoEFLaae0jktygf/Ha83cBofa7pvyK8y+TCB/y3NxuRrKcAsG5oGxOis5FKw+W4o fQD1jmt5PxNwlZAwOPtPf+YxL1JTlNJCgBW77F9k/Jl8v2aLhOiL6B9z2EONVLWVVO FkwXrOGSB+byrPU8N2tF57HXvNmDsajfyHExrtun8cfO4Ow2woPLblzsrt/+BhYGph TtCWZP8M9SqOg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:814::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 158CE408B4; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:37:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Karl Mehltretter , Kees Cook Cc: Karl Mehltretter , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , James Morris , Ke Wu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] loadpin: Fix stale KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG reference in documentation In-Reply-To: <20260905013655.58665-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> References: <20260905013655.58665-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:37:14 -0600 Message-ID: <87v78671cl.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karl Mehltretter writes: > Commit 99d5cadfde2b ("kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG > and KEXEC_SIG_FORCE") removed CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG but left the > LoadPin documentation pointing at it. Refer to CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG instead. > > While at it, clean up the grammar of the sentence. > > Fixes: 99d5cadfde2b ("kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG_FORCE") > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/LoadPin.rst | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon