From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B730CEEB3 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708552599; cv=none; b=YaWjjPhQY4bYfF67enEY1RNMB/hM+P68U82L7plRNBz9e7UGU+BQoqox+CL7wgBy/UgQ2KDVbWJRzninM+OqrjnJf6M6qLFh1QFWFlCQ6q8TKYMPF4sGY2zMFv7Sz/d/+soSDYGJUA92U9uWOEu5zWTsQjG7ck79mQLm84x7RKU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708552599; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OyRow3DdRAYVCPA+6fTJxNAEs8n5BLDE+pMgkX/vORY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EoqO9bybSkjWnbbiNuLw8xXSovvHGNWYSakBJbJz+KN5pyeRLjRwX5KJ2hHP1kC8mqgpmq8I7uwVzgihFlEKzrotR4v2/gsY81AvGOBrKH9TvTeM2i83SxESs6+h7GSoxjyR8p69rc1umFjS0VmHjwT5gmxotgeAdTY1Aw/JSEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=N1G8EK0x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="N1G8EK0x" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708552596; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wz69wT3KOjKDMqorWTqZ4COQkehom3tYVQ/EfROhM1o=; b=N1G8EK0xNDgf6+a2BcXmHW91Uu8NiE62gpTS+z/ZDFm4SVHRsvLGDzGDx0fbK3buhzCQZ6 YJ96dyBG1StnbkkXRPoQJtdyFSvD6MkUsQwR+8nKuYg4BHnv9YtKjPc5RDhjbzaFNfbhIw e5O4i+J3uwcQ2Bo7sqLWVpqCud9h5z0= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-613-XPBq_9WEPIeK1PzFJHNcJw-1; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:56:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XPBq_9WEPIeK1PzFJHNcJw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33d256ca4c8so2499870f8f.3 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:56:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708552592; x=1709157392; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wz69wT3KOjKDMqorWTqZ4COQkehom3tYVQ/EfROhM1o=; b=ixqFsmONAIWrneXFMldd4K+F1pDHqjAfNvow6j6sWQaH/yiVM7f8rr+tqBHKD8J8Gp KtsoS6ohBa3TLh4G1BB5IvHM50CK0F3ilfUuzRyukp20NzdIlSxgjt/v9N8SRobuWZql yCIcJ0bCFyR02YQSXVg0Ad0ui/8APl96PwernA5QlycsBo9xk31xnABIGIWLvUb+aogB d2LDXuqKbys7by/FwZIHD/0caYlH9RMmd/X2ilboJoMTTiT6isi/+pmScRQYvXYm0ebk qERwc5BgcZ+50jWQZ5aWZNIqsVkEVU0AdnvNc9YR9b7ysO1fAwbZbCApUW50hQUpI1C9 hdcg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVTYdS4Wb5iAtZfBW7xodNYUxDuXFcXkanjI/xH0ZZEbEnIwMOJCr1M8VXMi1+AjQOBZ3W9B3h8zAn7e+1Y1jfgdOUakhbiVHzEJy+v X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyhly4eoUTurfT+rEjIKHe8TRAEswWN+FxnbrnRmpHCa8AMfgl1 hnQDXkMZwSLTnSQBRayjyld50PQKSyUsgSx4ya60UkXafCZeDqobFrvkyCrkSvtBWWkgsxEqBt3 Rc+YGSNOMrR6eK3/zQK9bPhJ3PVuAlkMUQreMnih3uEQHsBlwvA+khB2t+VZlCA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1104:b0:33d:3b09:e06f with SMTP id z4-20020a056000110400b0033d3b09e06fmr8943476wrw.54.1708552592102; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:56:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEZ7rF8Wet2GZBYN3pL68kY2DE/ZJSFf5X2VoXNwVPOXFvyfKUeS8B7Ly5dProvwU8w7ze0tw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1104:b0:33d:3b09:e06f with SMTP id z4-20020a056000110400b0033d3b09e06fmr8943457wrw.54.1708552591761; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:56:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (205.pool92-176-231.dynamic.orange.es. [92.176.231.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk26-20020a0560001d9a00b0033d568f8310sm10242215wrb.89.2024.02.21.13.56.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:56:31 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Maxime Ripard , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Enric Balletbo i Serra , Erico Nunes , Brian Masney , Bjorn Andersson , Catalin Marinas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Konrad Dybcio , Marek Szyprowski , Neil Armstrong , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support In-Reply-To: <724jnhrbs6r4q6whynr3aon5w7mhfvetlgcnts4nukvtxbuium@mrjv6apjqk7r> References: <20240221141350.3740488-1-javierm@redhat.com> <1f28256c-e436-4add-aa67-2cfb2248b220@linaro.org> <6scz7iti3tzzrd4ph3gnuc2pvkcbtuuicgfgujh3pa3c34kdkt@bhfa4xbxeu7t> <56625c21-1b34-479b-b5b2-4c4d8b7a11b3@app.fastmail.com> <724jnhrbs6r4q6whynr3aon5w7mhfvetlgcnts4nukvtxbuium@mrjv6apjqk7r> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:56:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87v86h7a7l.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Maxime Ripard writes: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:41:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 16:24, Maxime Ripard wrote: [...] >> > Being able to test an upstream kernel quickly when you have a bug in a >> > downstream distro is super valuable for any distro developper. And on >> > the long run, if we don't make the switch from a kernel distro to a >> > mainline kernel relatively easy, we're the ones that will lose out. >> > Because people just won't bother, or be frustrated and thus super >> > reluctant to do that work. >> >> We had previously discussed adding config fragments for common >> distros the way we have kvm_guest.config, but if the Javier's >> patch is all that is actually needed for Fedora, that seems better >> to me than the added complexity of fragments. > > Oh, right. Fragments would be a great tool to reconcile the need for > minimal boot time and supporting reasonable use-cases. > > I guess it's even more of a struggle with the single arm64 defconfig vs > the minimal vs batteries included defconfig setup we had for arm. > I'm OK with using fragments instead and propose a fedora.config or whatever name is decided for this. As long as the list is kept in the mainline repo, instead of every Fedora developer having to make local changes in their .config, it works for me. > Maxime -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat