From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD91DC4346E for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E07B2388A for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="SyZdcieg"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="T9nd67LC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727279AbgIXIgF (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 04:36:05 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:44130 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726837AbgIXIgE (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 04:36:04 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1600936563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TDxJccgKr/pqF0i8iVp/rre3jVO7uhvMIYmZMnvVvZU=; b=SyZdciegcKpPV0jjV9bRo7+vUSCKycz9MgFEb9oTm6uwrf3OSk8uq2hYmxa/8CocuFkL1x 4Pd6h8RV0R6hyGzlxiXwtyQzwo7vO4Ht6O/NcntsACRqThO4QO9GQW3DDb7jJhd6Gg2sei sYKVTtvpjEIeaQ9VICZcCwqjIbx2Esg/A7aSUfZN7CO43O4Do3tlFHxYIFk101FjNkOYAC xlH/REP186S6g/9iPvvKKdv21WS6xvP81kjtMg6fFm8rvmcCHwt9mIXRY46eihHDm2Lt5O pUCQQx1Cy+oElJln7Poo0i52iAL80S/YDqzpjAY1VlUCYTMyPmvxzD5RKdpojA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1600936563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TDxJccgKr/pqF0i8iVp/rre3jVO7uhvMIYmZMnvVvZU=; b=T9nd67LCewMGjblbiZmewyerC19x+1DjMLYUzTl3K8oD1lOpWuJupJC/YoXUZZ/CzaPVGc DYG+qCSYzGYdg2CQ== To: qianjun.kernel@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: laoar.shao@gmail.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, urezki@gmail.com, jun qian Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] softirq: Factor loop termination condition In-Reply-To: <20200915115609.85106-3-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> References: <20200915115609.85106-1-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> <20200915115609.85106-3-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:36:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9g38tcc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 19:56, qianjun kernel wrote: > asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void) > { > u64 start = sched_clock(); > unsigned long old_flags = current->flags; > - int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART; > + unsigned int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART; And this change is related to making the timeout check a function in which way? Thanks, tglx