From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] signal: Factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 06:55:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9lx3t4j.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c51c6192-2ea4-62d8-dd22-305f7a1e0dd3@c-s.fr> (Christophe Leroy's message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:05:19 +0200")
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
> Le 17/04/2020 à 23:09, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
>>
>> To remove the use of set_fs in the coredump code there needs to be a
>> way to convert a kernel siginfo to a userspace compat siginfo.
>>
>> Call that function copy_siginfo_to_compat and factor it out of
>> copy_siginfo_to_user32.
>
> I find it a pitty to do that.
>
> The existing function could have been easily converted to using
> user_access_begin() + user_access_end() and use unsafe_put_user() to copy to
> userspace to avoid copying through a temporary structure on the stack.
>
> With your change, it becomes impossible to do that.
I don't follow. You don't like temporary structures in the coredump
code or temporary structures in copy_siginfo_to_user32?
A temporary structure in copy_siginfo_to_user is pretty much required
so that it can be zeroed to guarantee we don't pass a structure with
holes to userspace.
The implementation of copy_siginfo_to_user32 used to use the equivalent
of user_access_begin() and user_access_end() and the code was a mess
that was very difficult to reason about. I recall their being holes
in the structure that were being copied to userspace.
Meanwhile if you are going to set all of the bytes a cache hot temporary
structure is quite cheap.
> Is that really an issue to use that set_fs() in the coredump code ?
Using set_fs() is pretty bad and something that we would like to remove
from the kernel entirely. The fewer instances of set_fs() we have the
better.
I forget all of the details but set_fs() is both a type violation and an
attack point when people are attacking the kernel. The existence of
set_fs() requires somethings that should be constants to be variables.
Something about that means that our current code is difficult to protect
from spectre style vulnerabilities.
There was a very good thread about it all in I think 2018 but
unfortunately I can't find it now.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-18 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 7:01 remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] signal: clean up __copy_siginfo_to_user32 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 21:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] signal: Factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32 Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-18 8:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-18 11:55 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2020-04-19 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 9:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 9:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: Remove the set_fs in binfmt_elf.c:fill_siginfo_note Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] signal: clean up __copy_siginfo_to_user32 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] signal: replace __copy_siginfo_to_user32 with to_compat_siginfo Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] binfmt_elf: open code copy_siginfo_to_user to kernelspace buffer Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 8:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-17 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 3:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-15 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] binfmt_elf_fdpic: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_fdpic_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] exec: simplify the copy_strings_kernel calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 7:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] exec: open code copy_string_kernel Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 8:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-19 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 9:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-17 22:41 ` remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2 Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-19 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 11:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9lx3t4j.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®