mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/64s: Enable barrier_nospec based on firmware settings
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 21:11:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vac7r5px.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426180258.04e6bee6@kitsune.suse.cz>

Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:15:57 +1000
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
>> From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
>> 
>> Check what firmware told us and enable/disable the barrier_nospec as
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> We err on the side of enabling the barrier, as it's no-op on older
>> systems, see the comment for more detail.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
...
>
> I am missing the option for the barrier to be disabled by a kernel
> commandline argument here.
>
> It does make sense to add a kernel parameter that is checked on boot to
> be compatible with other platforms that implement one.

No other platforms have an option to disable variant 1 mitigations, so
there isn't an existing parameter we can use.

Which is not to say we can't add one, but I wasn't sure if it was really
worth it.

But I guess we should add one, I might do it as a follow-up patch.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-01 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-24  4:15 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/64s: Add barrier_nospec Michael Ellerman
2018-04-24  4:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/64s: Add support for ori barrier_nospec patching Michael Ellerman
2018-04-26 16:10   ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-01 12:25     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-04-24  4:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/64s: Patch barrier_nospec in modules Michael Ellerman
2018-05-03 13:15   ` Michal Suchánek
2018-04-24  4:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/64s: Enable barrier_nospec based on firmware settings Michael Ellerman
2018-04-26 16:02   ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-01 11:11     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-05-02 11:41       ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-04  0:58         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-04-24  4:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: Use barrier_nospec in copy_from_user() Michael Ellerman
2018-04-24  4:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/64: Use barrier_nospec in syscall entry Michael Ellerman
2018-04-24  5:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/64s: Add barrier_nospec Nicholas Piggin
2018-05-28 13:19 ` [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Enhance the information in cpu_show_spectre_v1() Michal Suchanek
2018-05-29 14:03   ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-29 14:13   ` Christophe LEROY
2018-05-29 14:46     ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-29 15:24       ` Christophe Leroy
2018-05-29 16:15         ` Joe Perches
2018-06-04 14:11   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-06-04 14:10 ` [1/6] powerpc/64s: Add barrier_nospec Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vac7r5px.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®