From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751528AbdJCJSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 05:18:18 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:59875 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbdJCJSR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 05:18:17 -0400 From: Michael Ellerman To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Meyer Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.14-rc3 In-Reply-To: References: <1506937773-18999-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20171002141046.scuga6mspuysxtfi@olymp> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 20:18:14 +1100 Message-ID: <87vajwd1yh.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in >>> v4.14-rc3[1] compared to v4.13[2]. >> >> a question regarding the um-defconfig build: >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/target/2974/ >> >> The error thrown looks like a libc installation error. can this be fixed >> on the build server? > > I'll let Michael answer that question... Thanks for the report. I think the problem is simply that the toolchain has no libc, so it can't build UML (?). I've switched it to using one of the toolchains from Free Electrons, which is built with glibc, and that seems to be working: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13171418/ Let me know if that's no good. cheers