From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758776AbcLAF2r (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:28:47 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:47902 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755502AbcLAF2p (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:28:45 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org ADF96613E9 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: David Miller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers 2016-11-29 References: <87r35utjq7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20161130.143444.242053190479060640.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:19:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161130.143444.242053190479060640.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:34:44 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87vav4rzu0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: Kalle Valo > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:59:44 +0200 > >> if there's still time here's one more patch to 3.9. I think this is good >> to have in 3.9 as it fixes an issue where we were printing uninitialised >> memory in mwifiex. I had this in wireless-drivers already for some time >> as I was waiting for other fixes and nothing serious actually came up. >> >> If this doesn't make it to 3.9 that's not a problem, I'll just merge >> this to wireless-drivers-next. Let me know what you prefer. > > Unless you are in a time-machine of some sort I assume you mean "4.9" not > "3.9" :-) > > Pulled, thanks. Hah, I have no idea where I came up with this "3.9" :) I was trying mean "4.9" of course, thanks for pulling. -- Kalle Valo