From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf tools: add kcore to the object code reading test
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:24:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc3s1uxj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374760890-30558-9-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (Adrian Hunter's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:01:29 +0300")
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:01:29 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Make the "object code reading" test attempt to read from
> kcore.
>
> The test uses objdump which struggles with kcore. i.e.
> doesn't always work, sometimes takes a long time.
> The test has been made to work around those issues.
>
[SNIP]
> - if (al.map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS) {
> + if (al.map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
> + !dso__is_kcore(al.map->dso)) {
I was confused. So this means that the symbols came from the kallsyms
but actual binary data came from the kcore, right?
> pr_debug("Unexpected kernel address - skipping\n");
> return 0;
> }
[SNIP]
> +
> + /* 2nd time through we just try kcore */
> + if (try_kcore && !have_kcore)
> + return TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE;
> +
> + /* No point getting kernel events if there is no kernel object */
> + if (!have_vmlinux && !have_kcore)
> excl_kernel = true;
>
> threads = thread_map__new_by_tid(pid);
> @@ -457,8 +502,12 @@ static int do_test_code_reading(void)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_err;
>
> - if (!have_vmlinux)
> + if (!have_vmlinux && !have_kcore && !try_kcore)
> + err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KERNEL_OBJ;
> + else if (!have_vmlinux && !try_kcore)
> err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_VMLINUX;
> + else if (!have_kcore && try_kcore)
> + err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE;
It seems that the above line is not reachable since we already bailed
out the second test if we don't have kcore.
> else if (excl_kernel)
> err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_ACCESS;
> else
> @@ -485,7 +534,9 @@ int test__code_reading(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = do_test_code_reading();
> + ret = do_test_code_reading(false);
> + if (!ret)
Shouldn't it be
if (ret)
?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + ret = do_test_code_reading(true);
>
> switch (ret) {
> case TEST_CODE_READING_OK:
> @@ -493,9 +544,15 @@ int test__code_reading(void)
> case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_VMLINUX:
> fprintf(stderr, " (no vmlinux)");
> return 0;
> + case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE:
> + fprintf(stderr, " (no kcore)");
> + return 0;
> case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_ACCESS:
> fprintf(stderr, " (no access)");
> return 0;
> + case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KERNEL_OBJ:
> + fprintf(stderr, " (no kernel obj)");
> + return 0;
> default:
> return -1;
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-25 14:01 [PATCH 0/9] perf tools: add support for reading object code Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf tools: add test " Adrian Hunter
2013-07-29 6:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-07-30 21:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-31 17:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-08-03 13:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf tools: load kernel maps before using Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 20:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf tools: make it possible to read object code from vmlinux Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf tools: adjust the vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms test Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf tools: avoid SyS kernel syscall aliases Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf tools: make it possible to read object code from kernel modules Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf tools: add support for reading from /proc/kcore Adrian Hunter
2013-07-30 4:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-07-30 21:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf tools: add kcore to the object code reading test Adrian Hunter
2013-07-30 5:24 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-07-30 21:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf tools: allow annotation using /proc/kcore Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 20:22 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf tools: add support for reading object code Ingo Molnar
2013-07-27 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vc3s1uxj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome