mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf tools: add kcore to the object code reading test
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:24:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc3s1uxj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374760890-30558-9-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (Adrian Hunter's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:01:29 +0300")

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:01:29 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Make the "object code reading" test attempt to read from
> kcore.
>
> The test uses objdump which struggles with kcore. i.e.
> doesn't always work, sometimes takes a long time.
> The test has been made to work around those issues.
>
[SNIP]

> -	if (al.map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS) {
> +	if (al.map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
> +	    !dso__is_kcore(al.map->dso)) {

I was confused.  So this means that the symbols came from the kallsyms
but actual binary data came from the kcore, right?


>  		pr_debug("Unexpected kernel address - skipping\n");
>  		return 0;
>  	}

[SNIP]
> +
> +	/* 2nd time through we just try kcore */
> +	if (try_kcore && !have_kcore)
> +		return TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE;
> +
> +	/* No point getting kernel events if there is no kernel object */
> +	if (!have_vmlinux && !have_kcore)
>  		excl_kernel = true;
>  
>  	threads = thread_map__new_by_tid(pid);
> @@ -457,8 +502,12 @@ static int do_test_code_reading(void)
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out_err;
>  
> -	if (!have_vmlinux)
> +	if (!have_vmlinux && !have_kcore && !try_kcore)
> +		err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KERNEL_OBJ;
> +	else if (!have_vmlinux && !try_kcore)
>  		err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_VMLINUX;
> +	else if (!have_kcore && try_kcore)
> +		err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE;

It seems that the above line is not reachable since we already bailed
out the second test if we don't have kcore.


>  	else if (excl_kernel)
>  		err = TEST_CODE_READING_NO_ACCESS;
>  	else
> @@ -485,7 +534,9 @@ int test__code_reading(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = do_test_code_reading();
> +	ret = do_test_code_reading(false);
> +	if (!ret)

Shouldn't it be

	if (ret)
?

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +		ret = do_test_code_reading(true);
>  
>  	switch (ret) {
>  	case TEST_CODE_READING_OK:
> @@ -493,9 +544,15 @@ int test__code_reading(void)
>  	case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_VMLINUX:
>  		fprintf(stderr, " (no vmlinux)");
>  		return 0;
> +	case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KCORE:
> +		fprintf(stderr, " (no kcore)");
> +		return 0;
>  	case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_ACCESS:
>  		fprintf(stderr, " (no access)");
>  		return 0;
> +	case TEST_CODE_READING_NO_KERNEL_OBJ:
> +		fprintf(stderr, " (no kernel obj)");
> +		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		return -1;
>  	};

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-25 14:01 [PATCH 0/9] perf tools: add support for reading object code Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf tools: add test " Adrian Hunter
2013-07-29  6:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-07-30 21:11     ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-31 17:43       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-08-03 13:47         ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf tools: load kernel maps before using Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 20:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf tools: make it possible to read object code from vmlinux Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf tools: adjust the vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms test Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf tools: avoid SyS kernel syscall aliases Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf tools: make it possible to read object code from kernel modules Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf tools: add support for reading from /proc/kcore Adrian Hunter
2013-07-30  4:37   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-07-30 21:12     ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf tools: add kcore to the object code reading test Adrian Hunter
2013-07-30  5:24   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-07-30 21:17     ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 14:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf tools: allow annotation using /proc/kcore Adrian Hunter
2013-07-25 20:22 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf tools: add support for reading object code Ingo Molnar
2013-07-27 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vc3s1uxj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome