From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A5CC55179 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D425922249 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2443796AbgJUO5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:57:11 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:34290 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2442007AbgJUO5K (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:57:10 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kVFY2-00C1oh-KT; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:57:06 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1kVFXy-0003Sy-G0; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:57:06 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Mark Salyzyn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Miklos Szeredi , Jonathan Corbet , Vivek Goyal , Amir Goldstein , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Smalley , John Stultz , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org References: <20201021143533.115895-1-salyzyn@android.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:57:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20201021143533.115895-1-salyzyn@android.com> (Mark Salyzyn's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:35:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87wnzj6305.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1kVFXy-0003Sy-G0;;;mid=<87wnzj6305.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX199I58QG2refBpWT2h/3qg84rj5WxpAjCg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 0/4] overlayfs override_creds=off & nested get xattr fix X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there any reason why the cc list from the body of the email does not match the people who have been cc'd on the email. Skipping the linux-unionfs list (which seems to be the mail list for overlayfs) seems like a pretty big oversight. > Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn > Cc: Miklos Szeredi > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: Vivek Goyal > Cc: Eric W. Biederman > Cc: Amir Goldstein > Cc: Randy Dunlap > Cc: Stephen Smalley > Cc: John Stultz > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > To: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > Cc: kernel-team@android.com > Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Eric