From: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: "tee-dev@lists.linaro.org" <tee-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: remove address tag in check_mem_type()
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:24:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnzv639c.fsf@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44EAR=5Syz9vz4pCNm8ytqd3rhj=PDE8trAvOiAdhs_T8A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Jens,
Jens Wiklander writes:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:26 AM Volodymyr Babchuk
> <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com> wrote:
>>
>> Before passing 'start' to find_vma() we need to remove
>> tags from it to get sane results.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Would you mind giving a bit more background to this? For example in
> which contexts this function does or doesn't work as expected? Do you
> have any special use cases that don't work, etc? This is not a new
> regression, it's rather a problem we've always had, right?
Yes, sorry. I had to clarify in the commit description. Issue was found
on Android. Android uses pointer tagging [1], so MSB of user pointers
contain tags. As a result, passing raw user address to find_vma() leads
to NULL result, as it only traverses RB tree and does not alter passed
address in any way.
Code in mm/gup.c already strips tags and maybe, it is better to call
untagged_addr() inside of find_vma(). I'm not sure. Probably, we need
some help from MM maintainers.
Anyways, this patched fixed issue with register_shm failing in our use
case.
[1] https://source.android.com/devices/tech/debug/tagged-pointers
--
Volodymyr Babchuk at EPAM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 9:26 Volodymyr Babchuk
2020-10-12 11:35 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-10-12 12:24 ` Volodymyr Babchuk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnzv639c.fsf@epam.com \
--to=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tee-dev@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome