From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/lib: Remove .balign inside string functions for PPC32
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:46:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wow2mm2b.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517231938.4b1b8172@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:04:13 +0200 (CEST)
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>
>> commit 87a156fb18fe1 ("Align hot loops of some string functions")
>> degraded the performance of string functions by adding useless
>> nops
>>
>> A simple benchmark on an 8xx calling 100000x a memchr() that
>> matches the first byte runs in 41668 TB ticks before this patch
>> and in 35986 TB ticks after this patch. So this gives an
>> improvement of approx 10%
>>
>> Another benchmark doing the same with a memchr() matching the 128th
>> byte runs in 1011365 TB ticks before this patch and 1005682 TB ticks
>> after this patch, so regardless on the number of loops, removing
>> those useless nops improves the test by 5683 TB ticks.
>>
>> Fixes: 87a156fb18fe1 ("Align hot loops of some string functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>> ---
>> Was sent already as part of a serie optimising string functions.
>> Resending on itself as it is independent of the other changes in the
>> serie
>>
>> arch/powerpc/lib/string.S | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>> index a787776822d8..a026d8fa8a99 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ _GLOBAL(strncpy)
>> mtctr r5
>> addi r6,r3,-1
>> addi r4,r4,-1
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>> .balign 16
>> +#endif
>> 1: lbzu r0,1(r4)
>> cmpwi 0,r0,0
>> stbu r0,1(r6)
>
> The ifdefs are a bit ugly, but you can't argue with the numbers. These
> alignments should be IFETCH_ALIGN_BYTES, which is intended to optimise
> the ifetch performance when you have such a loop (although there is
> always a tradeoff for a single iteration).
>
> Would it make sense to define that for 32-bit as well, and you could use
> it here instead of the ifdefs? Small CPUs could just use 0.
Can we do it with a macro in the header, eg. like:
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
#define IFETCH_BALIGN .balign IFETCH_ALIGN_BYTES
#endif
...
addi r4,r4,-1
IFETCH_BALIGN
1: lbzu r0,1(r4)
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 10:04 Christophe Leroy
2018-05-17 13:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-05-17 13:46 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-05-17 14:21 ` Christophe LEROY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wow2mm2b.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®