From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: changbin.du@intel.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Du\,
Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>,
Du@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: usb/dwc3: fake dissconnect event when turn off pullup
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:31:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpnjmm7u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461745745-3954-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3527 bytes --]
Hi,
changbin.du@intel.com writes:
> From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
>
> The dwc3 controller can't generate a disconnect event after it is
> stopped. Thus gadget dissconnect callback is not invoked when do
not generating disconnect IRQ after you drop Run/Stop is expected.
> soft dissconnect. Call dissconnect here to workaround this issue.
I'm rather sure this is a bug elsewhere. How do you trigger this ?
> Note, most time we still see disconnect be called that because
> it is invoked by dwc3_gadget_reset_interrupt(). But if we
> disconnect cable once pullup disabled quickly, issue can be
> observed.
I can't understand what you're trying to say with this.
> Signed-off-by: Du, Changbin <changbin.du@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 8e4a1b1..cd73187 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -1566,6 +1566,15 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_run_stop(struct dwc3 *dwc, int is_on, int suspend)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void dwc3_disconnect_gadget(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> +{
> + if (dwc->gadget_driver && dwc->gadget_driver->disconnect) {
> + spin_unlock(&dwc->lock);
> + dwc->gadget_driver->disconnect(&dwc->gadget);
> + spin_lock(&dwc->lock);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
> {
> struct dwc3 *dwc = gadget_to_dwc(g);
> @@ -1575,6 +1584,21 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
> is_on = !!is_on;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
> + /**
> + * WORKAROUND: The dwc3 controller can't generate a disconnect
> + * event after it is stopped. Thus gadget dissconnect callback
> + * is not invoked when do soft dissconnect. Call dissconnect
> + * here to workaround this issue.
> + * Note, most time we still see disconnect be called that because
> + * it is invoked by dwc3_gadget_reset_interrupt(). But if we
> + * disconnect cable once pullup disabled quickly, issue can be
> + * observed.
> + */
> + if (!is_on && (dwc->gadget.speed != USB_SPEED_UNKNOWN)) {
> + dev_dbg(dwc->dev, "fake dissconnect event on pullup off\n");
> + dwc3_disconnect_gadget(dwc);
> + dwc->gadget.speed = USB_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> + }
this is *really* wrong. You shouldn't be calling pullup directly. This
patch looks wrong and you didn't even explain how to trigger this
problem; when does the problem happen ?
Gadget load/unload does the right thing here, so that can't be the
case. We also do the right thing on soft_connect sysfs file:
static ssize_t usb_udc_softconn_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t n)
{
struct usb_udc *udc = container_of(dev, struct usb_udc, dev);
if (!udc->driver) {
dev_err(dev, "soft-connect without a gadget driver\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (sysfs_streq(buf, "connect")) {
usb_gadget_udc_start(udc);
usb_gadget_connect(udc->gadget);
} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "disconnect")) {
usb_gadget_disconnect(udc->gadget);
udc->driver->disconnect(udc->gadget);
usb_gadget_udc_stop(udc);
} else {
dev_err(dev, "unsupported command '%s'\n", buf);
return -EINVAL;
}
return n;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(soft_connect, S_IWUSR, NULL, usb_udc_softconn_store);
So really, what _is_ the problem ?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 8:29 changbin.du
2016-04-27 9:31 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-04-27 11:27 ` Du, Changbin
2016-04-28 6:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-04-28 19:39 ` John Youn
2016-04-29 6:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-02 1:46 ` John Youn
2016-05-04 10:40 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-05 3:16 ` John Youn
2016-05-06 8:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-05 8:06 ` Peter Chen
2016-05-06 7:01 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-06 7:38 ` Peter Chen
2016-05-06 7:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-04-27 12:04 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpnjmm7u.fsf@intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=Du@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome