From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934730AbbIVUkJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:40:09 -0400
Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:55028 "EHLO canardo.mork.no"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S934612AbbIVUkH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:40:07 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, kafai@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?utf-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound
Organization: m
References: <20150920.225521.1063980101511317898.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20150921060636.GA30807@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<20150920.231104.525285577747035896.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20150921133415.GA1740@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<20150921182022.GB13263@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<20150922033856.GA7851@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<20150922161056.GB9761@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<CA+55aFyvPLD5tNsuxFAA4GgOZpamULJe7R90dXf5qSC6aBYzTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150922185357.GD17659@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<CA+55aFy3k_NouhizkAkiZkuTYTqEKQZCnz8yOzrSH8o4+vjKUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150922195059.GF17659@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<CA+55aFzvp5gGS9jVA2O=vVM3Fd=VpCEfaqw8UKoU_Wk-ZkOgOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:36:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzvp5gGS9jVA2O=vVM3Fd=VpCEfaqw8UKoU_Wk-ZkOgOg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:03:18 -0700")
Message-ID: <87wpvii42c.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130013 (Ma Gnus v0.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (canardo.mork.no [IPv6:2001:4641::1]); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:37:08 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> The PPRO_FENCE_BUG thing is rather questionable. I'm not sure it's
> even documented, but I can't find the official PPro errata now. I
> think I discussed it with Andy Glew back when Intel was starting to
> document the memory ordering rules.
>
> I'd be willing to get rid of it. It was apparently just an early
> stepping or two.
>
> Anybody with better google-fu than me who can find the official Intel
> PPro errata?

http://download.intel.com/design/archives/processors/pro/docs/24268935.pdf

Says "NoFix" for erratas 66 and 92.


Bjørn