From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751075AbWI2KUp (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:20:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751097AbWI2KUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:20:44 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:42449 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751075AbWI2KUn (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:20:43 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: [ACRYPTO] New asynchronous crypto layer (acrypto) release. Date: 29 Sep 2006 12:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87wt7nm0x5.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> References: <20060928120826.GA18063@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: zaphod.rfc1149.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:6f8:37a:2::2 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Evgeniy" == Evgeniy Polyakov writes: Evgeniy> Hello. I'm pleased to announce asynchronous crypto layer Evgeniy> (acrypto) [1] release for 2.6.18 kernel tree. Acrypto allows Evgeniy> to handle crypto requests asynchronously in hardware. Would userspace programs benefit from this patch? In particular, would OpenSSL get better performances on Via nehemiah CPUs or does it need to be patched? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/